Preview

Siberian journal of oncology

Advanced search

MRI TECHNIQUE OF DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT APPLIED TO THE DIAGNOSIS AND MONITORING OF CHEMO-RADIATION TREATMENT OF SECONDARY BONE LESIONS

Abstract

The data of 50 patients treated with chemo-radiotherapy treatment for metastatic lesions of the axial skeleton. The proposed technique MRI ADC «dual construct» can more accurately assess the early results of treatment.

About the Author

N. I. Sergeev
Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology of Russian Health Ministry, Moscow
Russian Federation


References

1. Hall F.M. Imaging bone metastases in breast cancer // Am. J. Roentgenol. 2005. Vol. 185 (4). P. 1082.

2. Ahadov T.A., Panov V.A., Ajhhoff U. Magnetic resonance imaging of the spinal cord and vertebral column. М., 2000. P. 16–132. [in Russian]

3. Kayhan A., Yang C., Soylu F.N., Lakadamyali H., Sethi I., Karczmar G., Stadler W., Oto A. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging findings of bone metastasis in patients with prostate cancer // World J. Radiol. 2011. Vol. 3 (10). P. 241–245. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v3.i10.241.

4. Ahmedzhanov F.M. Diagnostic imaging of the musculoskeletal system // Sovremennye tendencii kompleksnoj diagnostiki i lechenija zabolevanij kostno-myshechnoj sistemy: Mater. nauch.-prakt. konf. M., 2004. P. 3–6. [in Russian]

5. Michoux N., Simoni P., Tombal B., Peeters F., Machiels J.P., Lecouvet F. Evaluation of DCE-MRI postprocessing techniques to assess metastatic bone marrow in patients with prostate cancer // Clin. Imaging. 2012. Vol. 36 (4). P. 308–315. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2011.10.002.

6. Sergeev N.I., Nudnov N.V. Differential diagnosis between benign and malignant vertebral lesions using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging // Vestnik rentgenoradiologii. 2012. № 12 (4). URL: http://rncrr.ru/novosti/docs/v12_vol4.pdf (data obrashhenija: 15.10.14). [in Russian]

7. Sohaib S.A., Cook G., Allen S.D., Hughes M., Eisen T., Gore M. Comparison of whole-body MRI and bone scintigraphy in the detection of bone metastases in renal cancer // J. Radiol. 2009. Vol. 82 (980). P. 632–639. doi: 10.1259/bjr/52773262.

8. Sergeev N.I. Diagnostic imaging of bone metastases // Medicinskaja vizualizacija. 2011. № 4. P. 46–47. [in Russian]

9. Vaccaro A., Prisco M.R., Gatta G. Multimodal imaging in bone metastases // J. Recenti Prog. Med. 2012. Vol. 103 (11). P. 397–403. doi: 10.1701/1166.12877. Review. Italian.

10. Harchenko V.P., Kotljarov P.M., Sergeev N.I. The role of МРТ in diagnosis and monitoring of the response of bone metastases to treatment // Sovremennye tendencii kompleksnoj diagnostiki i lechenija skeletnomyshechnoj sistemy: Sb. dokladov 5 nauch.-prakt. konf. M., 2004. P. 233–235. [in Russian]

11. Yang C., Karczmar G.S., Medved M., Oto A., Zamora M., Stadler W.M. Reproducibility assessment of a multiple reference tissue method for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI analysis // Magn. Reson. Med. 2009. Vol. 61 (4). P. 851–859. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21912

12. Chissov V.I., Davydov M.I.. Oncology. National guideline. М., 2008. 648 p. [in Russian] 7. Guillevin R., Vallee J.N., Lafitte F., Menuel C., Duverneuil N.M., Chiras J. Spine metastasis imaging: review of the literature // J. Neuroradiol. 2007. Vol. 34 (5). P. 311–321.

13. Guo J-Y., Reddick W.E. DCE-MRI pixel-by-pixel quantitative curve pattern analysi and its application to osteosarcoma // J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2009. Vol. 30 (1). P. 177–184. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21785.

14. Hall F.M. Imaging bone metastases in breast cancer // Am. J. Roentgenol. 2005. Vol. 185 (4). P. 1082.

15. Kayhan A., Yang C., Soylu F.N., Lakadamyali H., Sethi I., Karczmar G., Stadler W., Oto A. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging findings of bone metastasis in patients with prostate cancer // World J. Radiol. 2011. Vol. 3 (10). P. 241–245. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v3.i10.241.

16. Michoux N., Simoni P., Tombal B., Peeters F., Machiels J.P., Lecouvet F. Evaluation of DCE-MRI postprocessing techniques to assess metastatic bone marrow in patients with prostate cancer // Clin. Imaging. 2012. Vol. 36 (4). P. 308–315. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2011.10.002.

17. Sohaib S.A., Cook G., Allen S.D., Hughes M., Eisen T., Gore M. Comparison of whole-body MRI and bone scintigraphy in the detection of bone metastases in renal cancer // J. Radiol. 2009. Vol. 82 (980). P. 632–639. doi: 10.1259/bjr/52773262.

18. Vaccaro A., Prisco M.R., Gatta G. Multimodal imaging in bone metastases // J. Recenti Prog. Med. 2012. Vol. 103 (11). P. 397–403. doi: 10.1701/1166.12877. Review. Italian.

19. Yang C., Karczmar G.S., Medved M., Oto A., Zamora M., Stadler W.M. Reproducibility assessment of a multiple reference tissue method for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI analysis // Magn. Reson. Med. 2009. Vol. 61 (4). P. 851–859. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21912


Review

For citations:


Sergeev N.I. MRI TECHNIQUE OF DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT APPLIED TO THE DIAGNOSIS AND MONITORING OF CHEMO-RADIATION TREATMENT OF SECONDARY BONE LESIONS. Siberian journal of oncology. 2015;1(1):26-32. (In Russ.)

Views: 615


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1814-4861 (Print)
ISSN 2312-3168 (Online)