INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS AFTER RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERIES IN BREAST CANCER PATIENTS: A CASE REPORT
https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2021-20-3-151-157
Abstract
Introduction. Currently, there is no global consensus regarding the management of breast cancer patients with implant-associated infections. Some studies clearly recommend their removal and surgical debridement with consecutive antimicrobial treatment, while others prefer long-term antibacterial therapy (at least 1 month) with the effectiveness of such conservative approach of 36–73 %.
Case description. A 43-year-old patient suffering from brca1-positive right breast cancer t2n0m0 (invasive carcinoma of non-specific type g3, er – 8, pgr – 0, her-2/neu – 0, ki67 (%) – less than 20 %), underwent radical skin-preserving mastectomy on the right with simultaneous implant reconstruction and preventive subcutaneous mastectomy on the left with simultaneous implant reconstruction. Peri-implant infection in the left breast was observed on the 21st day after surgery.
Results. The patient received empirical therapy with cefepim. Microbiological examination of the punctate revealed the causative agent of infection – methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (mrsa) (1×105cfu/ml). Daptomycin 6 mg/kg/day was added to therapy. After 8 weeks, the patient received oral moxifloxacin 400 once daily, for another 3 weeks. A complete response was achieved. The patient has no signs of infection for 3 years.
Conclusion. Long-term etiotropic antibacterial therapy with daptomycin followed by oral moxifloxacin resulted in a stable clinical effect.
About the Authors
Z. V. GrigoryevskayaRussian Federation
MD, DSc, Leading Researcher, Microbiological Laboratory
24, Kashirskoye shosse, 115478, Moscow, Russia
R. M. Dokolin
Russian Federation
MD, Surgeon, Department of Reconstructive Surgery
24, Kashirskoye shosse, 115478, Moscow, Russia
I. V. Tereshchenko
Russian Federation
Researcher, Microbiological Laboratory
24, Kashirskoye shosse, 115478, Moscow, Russia
V. A. Sobolevsky
Russian Federation
MD, Professor, Head of Department of Reconstructive Surgery
24, Kashirskoye shosse, 115478, Moscow, Russia
N. V. Dmitrieva
Russian Federation
MD, Professor, Head of Microbiological Laboratory
24, Kashirskoye shosse, 115478, Moscow, Russia
V. D. Vinnikova
Russian Federation
student
20/1, Delegatskaya Street, 127473, Russia
V. A. Vershinskaya
Russian Federation
student
20/1, Delegatskaya Street, 127473, Russia
I. N. Petukhova
Russian Federation
MD, DSc, Leading Researcher, Microbiological Laboratory
24, Kashirskoye shosse, 115478, Moscow, Russia
N. S. Bagirova
Russian Federation
MD, DSc, Senior Researcher, Microbiological Laboratory
24, Kashirskoye shosse, 115478, Moscow, Russia
References
1. Kaprin A.D., Starinskii V.V., Petrova G.V. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2017 (morbidity and mortality). Moscow, 2018. 250 p. (in Russian).
2. Letyagin V.P. Breast tumors. Mammology. 2005; 1: 14–22. (in Russian).
3. Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D., Sobolevskii V.A., Chistyakov S.S., Grebennokova O.P., Krokhina O.V., Anurova O.A., Iskenderov R.M., Azimova R.B., Shoua A.N. Reconstructive surgery and rehabilitation of breast cancer patients. Russian Medical Journal. Oncology. 2011; 2: 42. (in Russian).
4. Grigorievskaya Z.V., Petukhova I.N., Dyakova S.A., Dmitrieva N.V. Epidemiology of hospital-acquired infections caused by highly resistant strains in cancer patients. Siberian Journal of Oncology. 2016; 15(3): 62–66. (in Russian). doi: 10.21294/1814-4861-2016-15-3-62-66.
5. Grigorievskaya Z.V., Petukhova I.N., Bagirova N.S., Shilnikova I.I., Tereshchenko I.V., Grigorievsky E.D., Dmitrieva N.V. Nasocomial infectoions in cancer patients: problem of gram-negative bacterial resistance. Siberian Journal of Oncology. 2017; 16(1): 91–97. (in Russian). doi: 10.21294/1814-4861-2017-16-1-91-97.
6. Jagsi R., Jiang J., Momoh A.O., Alderman A., Giordano S.H., Buchholz T.A., Pierce L.J., Kronowitz S.J., Smith B.D. Complications After Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer: A Claims-Based Analysis. Ann Surg. 2016 Feb; 263(2): 219–27. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001177.
7. Franchelli S., Pesce M., Baldelli I., Marchese A., Santi P., De Maria A. Analysis of clinical management of infected breast implants and of factors associated to successful breast pocket salvage in infections occurring after breast reconstruction. Int J Infect Dis. 2018 Jun; 71: 67–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.03.019.
8. Boustany A.N., Elmaraghi S., Agochukwu N., Cloyd B., Dugan A.J., Rinker B. A breast prosthesis infection update: Two-year incidence, risk factors and management at single institution. Indian J Plast Surg. 2018; 51(1): 7–14. doi: 10.4103/ijps.IJPS_215_17.
9. Ota D., Fukuuchi A., Iwahira Y., Kato T., Takeuchi M., Okamoto J., Nishi T. Identification of complications in mastectomy with immediate reconstruction using tissue expanders and permanent implants for breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer. 2016 May; 23(3): 400–6. doi: 10.1007/s12282-014-0577-4.
10. Viola G.M., Selber J.C., Crosby M., Raad I.I., Butler C.E., Villa M.T,. Kronowitz S.J., Clemens M.W., Garvey P., Yang W., Baumann D.P. Salvaging the Infected Breast Tissue Expander: A Standardized Multidisciplinary Approach. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jun 10; 4(6): e732. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000676.
Review
For citations:
Grigoryevskaya Z.V., Dokolin R.M., Tereshchenko I.V., Sobolevsky V.A., Dmitrieva N.V., Vinnikova V.D., Vershinskaya V.A., Petukhova I.N., Bagirova N.S. INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS AFTER RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERIES IN BREAST CANCER PATIENTS: A CASE REPORT. Siberian journal of oncology. 2021;20(3):151-157. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2021-20-3-151-157