Preview

Siberian journal of oncology

Advanced search

COMBINED TREATMENT OF OPERABLE RECTAL CANCER WITH NEGATIVE PROGNOSIS FACTORS: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2021-20-4-49-56

Abstract

Introduction. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nact) is a potential alternative to chemoradiation therapy (crt) for rectal cancer and may allow early prevention of distant metastasis.

Objective: to study the safety and efficacy of nact for patients with rectal cancer without damage to the mesorectal fascia.

Material and methods. From 2016 to 2019, patients with cancer of the upper ampullar (сmrt2-t4an+m0, cmrt4an0m0), medium ampullar (cmrt3сn0m0, cmrt2n+m0) rectal regions were included in the pilot prospective study. All patients underwent nact according to the capox 4 scheme. Evaluation of the effect was carried out on the basis of mri of the small pelvis. In the case of regression or stabilization, surgery was performed, and in the case of progression, crt was followed by surgery. After surgery, all patients were scheduled for adjuvant chemotherapy for a total duration of 6 months. The primary endpoint was the rate of pathological complete response (mandard trg 1). Secondary endpoints included disease progression, toxicity (nci-ctc v. 5.0), postoperative complications (clavien-dindo), chemotherapy regimen, and long-term treatment outcomes.

Results. 136 patients were included into the study. Of 130 (11 %) patients, who underwent only nact prior to surgery, 15 had pathological complete response. 99 patients (72.8 %) received a full course of chemotherapy for 6 months (nact + adjuvant pct). 6 (4.3 %) patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were treated with crt, 5 (3.67 %) of them due to local progression according to mri data, 1 (0.7 %) due to grade 3 toxicity during 1 course of pct and inability to continue chemotherapy treatment plan. Radiation therapy resulted in partial tumor regression in all patients. Systemic progression was not observed in any patient. Grade iii–iv toxicity was observed in 7 (5.1 %) patients, including bronchospasm (n=2, 1.4 %), thrombocytopenia (n=1, 0.7 %), neutropenia (n=1, 0.7 %), peripheral neuropathy (n=1, 0.7 %), cardiotoxicity (n=1, 0.7 %), diarrhea (n=1, 0.7 %). Grade v toxicity (acute myocardial infarction) was observed in 1 (0.7 %) patient. R0 resection was performed in all cases. Grade iiia postoperative complications occurred in 6 (4.4 %) patients, iiib complications in 5 (3.7 %) patients, and death due to sepsis after postoperative pneumonia in 1 (0.7 %) patient. The frequency of anastomotic leak was 3.6 % (n=5). The median follow-up was 31.4 months, the overall survival (os) and disease-free survival (dfs) rates were 94 % and 92.8 %.

Conclusion. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a promising treatment option for rectal cancer patients with negative prognostic factors.

About the Authors

S. O. Kochkina
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center Of Oncology, Ministry Of Health Of Russia
Russian Federation

 MD, Postgraduate, Surgery Department № 3 

24, Kashirskoye Shosse, 115478, Moscow, Russia



S. S. Gordeyev
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center Of Oncology, Ministry Of Health Of Russia
Russian Federation

 MD, PhD, Surgery Department № 3 

24, Kashirskoye Shosse, 115478, Moscow, Russia



K. S. Petrov
Medical Centers «Medskan»
Russian Federation

 MD, PhD, Chief Radiologist 

47, Leningradskoe Shosse, 188663, Moscow, Russia



Z. Z. Mammedli
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center Of Oncology, Ministry Of Health Of Russia
Russian Federation

 MD, PhD, Head of Surgery Department № 3 

24, Kashirskoye Shosse, 115478, Moscow, Russia



References

1. Association of Oncologists of Russia. Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of rectal cancer. 2020. 78 p. (in Russian).

2. Abraha I., Aristei C., Palumbo I., Lupattelli M., Trastulli S., Cirocchi R., De Florio R., Valentini V. Preoperative radiotherapy and curative surgery for the management of localised rectal carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 3; 10(10): CD002102. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002102.pub3.

3. NCCN Guidelines. Rectal cancer. 2020; 12.

4. Sebag-Montefiore D., Stephens R.J., Steele R., Monson J., Grieve R., Khanna S., Quirke P., Couture J., de Metz C., Myint A.S., Bessell E., Griffiths G., Thompson L.C., Parmar M. Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomized trial. Lancet. 2009 Mar 7; 373(9666): 811–20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60484-0.

5. Kapiteijn E., Marijnen C.A., Nagtegaal I.D., Putter H., Steup W.H., Wiggers T., Rutten H.J., Pahlman L., Glimelius B., van Krieken J.H., Leer J.W., van de Velde C.J.; Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 30; 345(9): 638–46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010580.

6. Knowles G., Haigh R., McLean C., Phillips H.A., Dunlop M.G., Din F.V. Long term effect of surgery and radiotherapy for colorectal cancer on defecatory function and quality of life. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013 Oct; 17(5): 570–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2013.01.010.

7. Wiltink L.M., Chen T.Y., Nout R.A., Kranenbarg E.M., Fiocco M., Laurberg S., van de Velde C.J., Marijnen C.A. Health-related quality of life 14 years after preoperative short-term radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomised trial. Eur J Cancer. 2014 Sep; 50(14): 2390–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.06.020.

8. Patel U.B., Taylor F., Blomqvist L., George C., Evans H., Tekkis P., Quirke P., Sebag-Montefiore D., Moran B., Heald R., Guthrie A., Bees N., Swift I., Pennert K., Brown G. Magnetic resonance imaging-detected tumor response for locally advanced rectal cancer predicts survival outcomes: MERCURY experience. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct 1; 29(28): 3753–60. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.9068.

9. Park I.J., You Y.N., Agarwal A., Skibber J.M., Rodriguez-Bigas M.A., Eng C., Feig B.W., Das P., Krishnan S., Crane C.H., Hu C.Y., Chang G.J. Neoadjuvant treatment response as an early response indicator for patients with rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012 May; 30(15): 1770–6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.7901.

10. Taylor F.G., Quirke P., Heald R.J., Moran B., Blomqvist L., Swift I., Sebag-Montefiore D.J., Tekkis P., Brown G.; MERCURY study group. Preoperative high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging can identify good prognosis stage I, II, and III rectal cancer best managed by surgery alone: a prospective, multicenter, European study. Ann Surg. 2011; 253(4): 711–9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31820b8d52.

11. Pantel K., Cote R.J., Fodstad O. Detection and clinical importance of micrometastatic disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Jul 7; 91(13): 1113–24. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.13.1113.

12. Nishimura J., Hasegawa J., Kato T., Yoshioka S., Noura S., Kagawa Y., Yasui M., Ikenaga M., Murata K., Hata T., Matsuda C., Mizushima T., Yamamoto H., Doki Y., Mori M.; Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Colorectal Group. Phase II trial of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) as perioperative therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018 Oct; 82(4): 707–716. doi: 10.1007/s00280-018-3663-z.

13. Cercek A., Weiser M.R., Goodman K.A., Reidy D.L., Wong W.D. Guillem J.G., Saltz L. Complete pathologic response in the primary of rectal or colon cancer treated with FOLFOX without radiation. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(15_suppl): 3649–3649. doi: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.3649.

14. Schrag D., Weiser M.R., Goodman K.A., Gonen M., Hollywood E., Cercek A., Reidy-Lagunes D.L., Gollub M.J., Shia J., Guillem J.G., Temple L.K., Paty P.B., Saltz L.B. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy without routine use of radiation therapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a pilot trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32(6): 513–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.7904.

15. Fernandez-Martos C., Estevan R., Salud A., Pericay C., Gallen M., Sierra E., Brown G. Neoadjuvant capecitabine, oxliplatin, and bevacizumab (CAPOX-B) in intermediate-risk rectal cancer (RC) patients defined by magnetic resonance (MR): GEMCAD 0801 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(15_suppl): 3586–3586. doi: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.3586.

16. Kamiya T., Uehara K., Nakayama G., Ishigure K., Kobayashi S. Hiramatsu K., Nakayama H., Yamashita K., Sakamoto E., Tojima Y., Kawai S., Kodera Y., Nagino M.; Nagoya Surgical Oncology Group and the Chubu Clinical Oncology Group. Early results of multicenter phase II trial of perioperative oxaliplatin and capecitabine without radiotherapy for high-risk rectal cancer: CORONA I study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016; 42(6): 829–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.02.014.

17. Danno K., Hata T., Tamai K., Fujie Y., Ide Y., Kim H.M., Ohnishi T., Morita S., Yoshioka S., Kudo T., Nishimura J., Matsuda C., Akamatsu H., Mizushima T., Nezu R., Doki Y., Mori M.; Multi-Center Clinical Study Group of Osaka; Colorectal Cancer Treatment Group (MCSGO). Interim analysis of a phase II trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) as adjuvant therapy in Japanese patients with operated stage III colon cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017 Oct; 80(4): 777–785. doi: 10.1007/s00280-017-3419-1.

18. Nishimura J., Hasegawa J., Kato T., Yoshioka S., Noura S., Kagawa Y., Yasui M., Ikenaga M., Murata K., Hata T., Matsuda C., Mizushima T., Yamamoto H., Doki Y., Mori M.; Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Colorectal Group. Phase II trial of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) as perioperative therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018 Oct; 82(4): 707–716. doi: 10.1007/s00280-018-3663-z.

19. Hasegawa J., Nishimura J., Mizushima T., Miyake Y., Kim H.M., Takemoto H., Tamagawa H., Noura S., Fujii M., Fujie Y., Kato T., Miwa H., Takemasa I., Ikeda M., Yamamoto H., Sekimoto M., Nezu R., Doki Y., Mori M. Neoadjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) combined with bevacizumab for high-risk localized rectal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014 May; 73(5): 1079–87. doi: 10.1007/s00280-014-2417-9.

20. Deng Y., Chi P., Lan P., Wang L., Chen W., Cui L., Chen D., Cao J., Wei H., Peng X., Huang Z., Cai G., Zhao R., Huang Z., Xu L., Zhou H., Wei Y., Zhang H., Zheng J., Huang Y., Zhou Z., Cai Y., Kang L., Huang M., Peng J., Ren D., Wang J. Modified FOLFOX6 With or Without Radiation Versus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin With Radiation in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Initial Results of the Chinese FOWARC Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Three-Arm Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 20; 34(27): 3300–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.6198.


Review

For citations:


Kochkina S.O., Gordeyev S.S., Petrov K.S., Mammedli Z.Z. COMBINED TREATMENT OF OPERABLE RECTAL CANCER WITH NEGATIVE PROGNOSIS FACTORS: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY. Siberian journal of oncology. 2021;20(4):49-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2021-20-4-49-56

Views: 1237


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1814-4861 (Print)
ISSN 2312-3168 (Online)