THE USE OF THE PROPELLER FLAP FOR COVERING SKIN DEFECT AFTER AXILLARY LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR BREAST CANCER

The purpose of the study was to assess the feasibility of using the propeller flap to cover a large axillary fossa defect following lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients.

Material and Methods. One hundred breast cancer patients underwent surgery. Out of them, 64 underwent Madden modified radical mastectomy and 36 radical breast resection using a propeller muscle flap. Out of 100 patients, 61 were followed up (50 after mastectomy and 11 after radical resection using a propeller flap). Fifteen patients were randomly selected for examination of the flap using ultrasound (2 patients after radical resection, 13patients after radical mastectomy). The follow-up time was from 3 to 6 months. We studied the following: bleeding in the postoperative period, hematoma, duration of lymphorrhea, duration of hospitalization, ultrasound findings, hand function, size of the upper limb, and physical activity.

Results. No statistically significant differences in the number of complications related to the surgery extent were found. Here was no bleeding. Small hematoma was observed in one patient who underwent breast resection. Forty-three (70.49 %) patients did not have lymphorrhea after drainage removal. Lymphorrhea was observed for a month in 9 (14.75 %) patients, for 1–2 months in 4 (6.56 %) patients, and for 3 months or more in 5 (8.2 %) patients – 3 months or more. Twelve (19.67 %) patients developed lymphoedema of the arm. Hospitalization period was 7 bed-days in 90.0 % of cases. The flap viability reached 100.0 %. In 54 (88.53 %) of 61 patients, the active function of the arm recovered. Thirty-eight (62 %) patients had ECOG 1 status 3 years after surgery.

Conclusion. The flap made it possible to solve the local problems of covering the axillary neurovascular bundle during lymphadenectomy for breast cancer and eliminating a large axillary fossa defect. The results obtained demonstrated high engraftment rates with a small number of complications, regardless of the surgery extent. 

1. Pak D.D., Ermoshchenkova M.V. Plastic surgery of the axillary-subclavian-subscapularis region in radical mastectomies for breast cancer. Surgery. Journal them. N.I. Pirogov. 2008; 10: 43–48. (in Russian).

2. Tkachuk O.A, Narov Yu.A., Voitsitskiy V.E., Lyubarskiy M.S., Khabarov D.V. Pathogenetic aspects of lymphotropic techniques in the prevention of early postoperative complications in patients with breast cancer. Siberian Journal of Oncology. 2008; Suppl. 2; 85–86. (in Russian).

3. Fatuev O.E., Kozlov N.S., Korolyuk G.M., Ratke I.A., Ronzin A.V., Stepanyants N.S., Belov E.N., Safronova V.V., Vagabova I.M. New approaches to prevention and treatment of early and late postoperative limphorrhea. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2019; 6(1): 60–74. (in Russian). doi: 10.17709/2409-2231-2019-6-1-6.

4. Korneyev K.V. Modern tendencies of prevention of lymphorrea after radical mastectomies (the literature review). Vestnik RCRR MZ RF. 2012; 12. URL: http://vestnik.rncrr.ru/vestnik/v12/papers/korneev_v12.htm (cited 1.05.2020). (in Russian).

5. Agrawal A., Ayantunde A.A., Cheung K.L. Concepts of seroma formation and prevention in breast cancer surgery. ANZ J Surg. 2006 Dec; 76(12): 1088–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03949.x.

6. van Bastelaar J., Granzier R., van Roozendaal L.M., Beets G., Dirksen C.D., Vissers Y. A multi-center, double blind randomized controlled trial evaluating flap fixation after mastectomy using sutures or tissue glue versus conventional closure: protocol for the Seroma reduction After Mastectomy (SAM) trial. BMC Cancer. 2018 Aug 17; 18(1): 830. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4740-8.

7. Erickson V.S., Pearson M.L., Ganz P.A., Adams J., Kahn K.L. Arm edema in breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Jan 17; 93(2): 96–111. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.2.96.

8. D’Arpa S., Toia F., Pirrello R., Moschella F., Cordova A. Propeller flaps: a review of indications, technique, and results. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014: 986829. doi: 10.1155/2014/986829.

9. Pignatti M., Ogawa R., Hallock G.G., Mateev M., Georgescu A.V., Balakrishnan G., Ono S., Cubison T.C.S., D’Arpa S., Koshima I., Hyakusoku H. The “Tokyo” consensus on propeller flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Feb; 127(2): 716–722. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181fed6b2.