Effcacy and toxicity of regorafenib compared to reintrodaction of chemotherapy in metastatic colon cancer: retrospective multicenter study

The objective of the study is to compare the effectiveness of various systemic therapies in the 3rd and subsequent lines of therapy of metastatic colon cancer.
Material and Methods. Retrospective multicenter study collected data from 2 clinics of the Russian Federation. We considered overall survival (OS) as the main criterion of effectiveness. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the additional criterion. We performed a single- and multifactorial analysis of the effect of various parameters on PFS. To evaluate the effectiveness of regorafenib and the reintroduction of previously effective drugs, we should prove the equivalence of reintroduction of the 3rd line chemotherapy (CT) and targeted therapy to regorafenib on the 6-month overall survival, provided that the equivalence boundaries would be between 0.8 and 1.25. To reach the 0.05 probability of type I error and the 80 % study power, 178 patients (89 in each group) should be included in the study.
Results. The database identifed 215 patients with morphologically confrmed metastatic colon cancer who received two or more lines of antitumor drug therapy from 2010 to 2021. We selected 132 patients with the history of regorafenib therapy and 83 patients with the reintroduction of a previously used chemotherapy regimen as 3rd line treatment. The median OS in the reintroduction and regorafenib groups did not differ (HR, 1.01; 95 % CI, 0.7–1.45; p=0.920); 6-month OS were 74 and 70 %, respectively. Progression-free survival was signifcantly higher in the reintroduction group (HR, 1.94; 95 % CI, 1.3–2.7; p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that the reintroduction of previous treatment regimens kept its independent positive effect on PFS (HR, 1.9; 95 % CI, 1.3–2.8; p<0.001). In our study, toxicity on the 3rd line of CT developed in 117 (54.4 %) of 215 patients and signifcantly more frequent in the regorafenib group: 67.4 % (89/132) vs 33.7 % (28/83) in the group with repeated administration of previously effective regimens (p<0.001).
Conclusion. Regorafenib and reintroduction of the previous treatment in the 3rd line did not differ in overall survival. Progression-free survival was signifcantly higher in the reintroduction group as the 3rd line of treatment, with signifcantly lower toxicity. 

1. Grothey A., Van Cutsem E., Sobrero A., Siena S., Falcone A., Ychou M., Humblet Y., Bouché O., Mineur L., Barone C., Adenis A., Tabernero J., Yoshino T., Lenz H.J., Goldberg R.M., Sargent D.J., Cihon F., Cupit L., Wagner A., Laurent D.; CORRECT Study Group. Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013; 381(9863): 303–12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61900-X.

2. van Cutsem E., Martinelli E., Cascinu S., Sobrero A., Banzi M., Seitz J.F., Barone C., Ychou M., Peeters M., Brenner B., Hofheinz R.D., Maiello E., André T., Spallanzani A., Garcia-Carbonero R., Arriaga Y.E., Verma U., Grothey A., Kappeler C., Miriyala A., Kalmus J., Falcone A., Zaniboni A. Regorafenib for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Progressed After Standard Therapy: Results of the Large, SingleArm, Open-Label Phase IIIb CONSIGN Study. Oncologist. 2019; 24(2): 185–92. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0072.

3. Lai E., Puzzoni M., Ziranu P., Cremolini C., Lonardi S., Banzi M., Mariani S., Liscia N., Cinieri S., Dettori M., Mencoboni M., Nappo F., Piacentini G., Labianca R., Zucchelli G., Boccaccino A., Conca V., Pusceddu V., Zaniboni A., Scartozzi M.; GISCAD (Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio dei Carcinomi dell’Apparato Digerente, Italian Group for the Study of Gastrointestinal Tumors). Long Term Survival With Regorafenib: REALITY (Real Life in Italy) Trial – A GISCAD Study. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2021; 20(4): 253–62. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.07.008.

4. Li J., Qin S., Xu R., Yau T.C., Ma B., Pan H., Xu J., Bai Y., Chi Y., Wang L., Yeh K.H., Bi F., Cheng Y., Le A.T., Lin J.K., Liu T., Ma D., Kappeler C., Kalmus J., Kim T.W.; CONCUR Investigators. Regorafenib plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care in Asian patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CONCUR): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16(6): 619–29. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70156-7.

5. Calegari M.A., Zurlo I.V., Stefano B.D., Camarda F., Dio C.D., Garuf G., Cassano A., Barone C.A., Bria E., Basso M., Orlandi A. FOLFOX rechallenge versus regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy: A retrospective analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37(4s): 669. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.4_suppl.669.

6. Köstek O., Hacıoğlu M.B., Sakin A., Demir T., Sarı M., Ozkul O., Araz M., Doğan A.F., Demircan N.C., Uzunoğlu S., Çiçin İ., Erdoğan B. Regorafenib or rechallenge chemotherapy: which is more efective in the third-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer? Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2019; 83(1): 115–22. doi: 10.1007/s00280-018-3713-6.