Analysis of the impact of cytoreductive surgery in patients with oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma in clinical practice
https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2024-23-1-53-62
Abstract
Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and metastasectomy are justified in patients with oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Objective: to evaluate the impact of cytoreductive surgery on survival rates in patients with oligometastatic RCС. Material and Methods. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 342 patients with oligometastatic RCC, who underwent systemic therapy and different types of cytoreductive surgeries at the Municipal Oncology Hospital No. 62 in Moscow and the Municipal Oncoloy Center in Saint Petersburg from 2006 to 2022. Cytoreductive nephrectomy was performed in 332 (97.1 %) patients, metastasectomy in 103 (30.1 %) patients. The survival rates of patients in treatment groups were evaluated using the Survival Analysis by calculating descriptive characteristics of survival time by means of a life-table and Kaplan–Meier curves. The results were considered statistically significant at p<0.05. Results. In the univariate analysis, in patients who underwent CN, the factors that had a negative effect on the prognosis of survival rates were the tumor grade, evidence of bone metastases, levels of ALP, LdH, ESR, as well as prognosis according to the IMdC model and metastasectomy. In the multivariate analysis, only IMdC prognosis was found to have a negative effect on survival rates. In both the univariate and multivariate analysis, in the group of patients who underwent metastasectomy, IMdC prognosis alone had an unfavorable impact on survival rates of patients with oligometastatic RCC. Conclusion. Our study showed that CN and metastasectomy had a statistically significant effect on OS (p=0.02 and p=0.032) of patients with oligometastatic RCC. division of the patients into prognosis groups according to the IMdC model showed that CN did not improve the OS rates in patients with oligometastatic RCC with intermediate and unfavorable prognosis, and metastasectomy significantly increased the OS rates in oligometastatic RCC patients with favorable and unfavorable prognosis (p=0.0055 and p=0.047). When evaluating prognostic factors in patients undergoing CN and metastasectomy, only IMdC prognosis had an impact on the OS rates (p<0.001).
About the Authors
D. V. SemenovRussian Federation
Dmitry V. Semenov - MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Oncology, Saint Petersburg State University; Urologic Oncologist, Saint Petersburg City Clinical Oncology Center.
7–9, Universitetskaya emb., Saint Petersburg, 199034; 56, Veteranov Ave., Saint Petersburg, 198255
R. V. Orlova
Russian Federation
Rashida V. Orlova - MD, Professor, Head of the Department of Oncology of the Faculty of Medicine, Saint Petersburg State University; Chief Specialist in Clinical Oncology, Saint Petersburg City Clinical Oncology Center.
7–9, Universitetskaya emb., Saint Petersburg, 199034; 56, Veteranov Ave., Saint Petersburg, 198255
V. I. Shirokorad
Russian Federation
Valery I. Shirokorad - MD, DSc, Head of the Urologic Oncology Department, Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62.
27, village Istra, Moscow, 143423
S. V. Kostritsky
Russian Federation
Stanislav V. Kostritsky - MD, Urologic Oncologist, Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62.
27, village Istra, Moscow, 143423
M. I. Gluzman
Russian Federation
Mark I. Gluzman - MD, PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of Oncology, Saint Petersburg State University; Head of the Department of Antitumor Drug Therapy, Saint Petersburg City Clinical Oncology Center.
7–9, Universitetskaya emb., Saint Petersburg, 199034; 56, Veteranov Ave., Saint Petersburg, 198255
Yu. S. Korneva
Russian Federation
Yulia S. Korneva - MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Pathological Anatomy, Smolensk State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russia; Associate Professor, Department of Pathological Anatomy, I.I. Mechnikov North-western State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russia; Pathologist, Pathology Department, Saint Petersburg City Hospital No. 26.
2, Kostushko St., Saint Petersburg, 196247; 28, Krupskaya St., Smolensk, 214018; 41, Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg, 191015
References
1. Capitanio U., Bensalah K., Bex A., Boorjian S.A., Bray F., Coleman J., Gore J.L., Sun M., Wood C., Russo P. Epidemiology of Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2019; 75(1): 74–84. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.036.
2. Ljungberg B., Albiges L., Abu-Ghanem Y., Bensalah K., Dabestani S., Fernández-Pello S., Giles R.H., Hofmann F., Hora M., Kuczyk M.A., Kuusk T., Lam T.B., Marconi L., Merseburger A.S., Powles T., Staehler M., Tahbaz R., Volpe A., Bex A. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2019 Update. Eur Urol. 2019; 75(5): 799–810. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.011.
3. Culp S.H., Tannir N.M., Abel E.J., Margulis V., Tamboli P., Matin S.F., Wood C.G. Can we better select patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma for cytoreductive nephrectomy? Cancer. 2010; 116(14): 3378–88. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25046.
4. Rini B.I., Dorff T.B., Elson P., Rodriguez C.S., Shepard D., Wood L., Humbert J., Pyle L., Wong Y.N., Finke J.H., Rayman P.A., Larkin J.M., Garcia J.A., Plimack E.R. Active surveillance in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: a prospective, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17(9): 1317–24. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30196-6.
5. Méjean A., Ravaud A., Thezenas S., Colas S., Beauval J.B., Bensalah K., Geoffrois L., Thiery-Vuillemin A., Cormier L., Lang H., Guy L., Gravis G., Rolland F., Linassier C., Lechevallier E., Beisland C., Aitchison M., Oudard S., Patard J.J., Theodore C., Chevreau C., Laguerre B., Hubert J., Gross-Goupil M., Bernhard J.C., Albiges L., Timsit M.O., Lebret T., Escudier B. Sunitinib Alone or after Nephrectomy in Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379(5): 417–27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803675.
6. Omid S., Abufaraj M., Remzi M. Metastasectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma: when and how? Curr Opin Urol. 2020; 30(4): 602–9. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000768.
7. Isali I., Braun A., Bukavina L., Psutka S.P. Role of cytoreductive surgery in the era of immunotherapy. Curr Opin Urol. 2022; 32(6): 618–26. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001037.
8. Ciccarese C., Iacovelli R., Porta C., Procopio G., Bria E., Astore S., Cannella M.A., Tortora G. Efficacy of VEGFR-TKIs plus immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with favorable IMDC prognosis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2021; 100. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102295.
9. Kim S.H., Suh Y.S., Lee D.E., Park B., Joo J., Joung J.Y., Seo H.K., Lee K.H., Chung J. A retrospective comparative study of progression-free survival and overall survival between metachronous and synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma in intermediate- or poor-risk patients treated with VEGF-targeted therapy. Oncotarget. 2017; 8(55): 93633–43. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20674.
10. Courcier J., Dalban C., Laguerre B., Ladoire S., Barthélémy P., Oudard S., Joly F., Gravis G., Chevreau C., Geoffrois L., Deluche É., Rolland F., Topart D., Culine S., Négrier S., Mahammedi H., Tantot F., Jamet A., Escudier B., Flippot R., Albigès L. Primary Renal Tumour Response in Patients Treated with Nivolumab for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results from the GETUG-AFU 26 NIVOREN Trial. Eur Urol. 2021; 80(3): 325–9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.05.020.
11. Kato R., Naito S., Numakura K., Hatakeyama S., Koguchi T., Kojima T., Kawasaki Y., Kandori S., Kawamura S., Arai Y., Ito A., Nishiyama H., Kojima Y., Ohyama C., Habuchi T., Tsuchiya N., Obara W. Significance of upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy stratified by IMDC risk for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in targeted therapy era - a multi-institutional retrospective study. Int J Clin Oncol. 2022; 27(3): 563–73. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-02091-8. Erratum in: Int J Clin Oncol. 2023; 28(5): 726–7.
12. Dr Hall B., Abel E.J. The Evolving Role of Metastasectomy for Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am. 2020; 47(3): 379–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2020.04.012.
13. Wu K., Liu Z., Shao Y., Li X. Nomogram Predicting Survival to Assist Decision-Making of Metastasectomy in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2020; 10. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.592243.
14. Verbiest A., Couchy G., Job S., Caruana L., Lerut E., Oyen R., de Reyniès A., Tosco L., Joniau S., Van Poppel H., Van Raemdonck D., Van Den Eynde K., Wozniak A., Zucman-Rossi J., Beuselinck B. Molecular Subtypes of Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma are Prognostic for Outcome After Complete Metastasectomy. Eur Urol. 2018; 74(4): 474–80. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.042.
Review
For citations:
Semenov D.V., Orlova R.V., Shirokorad V.I., Kostritsky S.V., Gluzman M.I., Korneva Yu.S. Analysis of the impact of cytoreductive surgery in patients with oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma in clinical practice. Siberian journal of oncology. 2024;23(1):53-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2024-23-1-53-62