ADHESIVE PROCESS AS A PROBLEM OF ONCOLOGY ABDOMINAL OPERATIVE SURGERY
https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2018-17-2-95-103
Abstract
Formation of intra-abdominal adhesions is a common consequence of abdominal surgery. Operative trauma is an essential component of any surgical intervention. This problem is particularly relevant in patients with intestinal obstruction resulting from a tumor, when it is necessary to perform reconstructive surgery after urgent obstructive resection of the colon. The review presents the data on current views of epidemiology, etiology, and pathogenesis as well as quantitative and qualitative classifications of intra-abdominal adhesions. The methods of prevention and diagnosis of abdominal adhesions have been discussed. The results of the effectiveness of the use of surgical, pharmacological and barrier methods for adhesion prevention have been presented.
About the Authors
F. Sh. Akhmetzyanov
Kazan State Medical University, Kazan;
Rebublic Clinical Cancer Center, Kazan
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
MD, Professor, Head of Department of Oncology and Radiation Therapy, Kazan State Medical University, Republican Clinical Oncology Center of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Tatarstan, Volga Federal Branch of N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation (Kazan, Russia)
Scopus Author ID: 6506033368
ResearcherID: F-4740-2016
V. I. Egorov
Kazan State Medical University, Kazan;
Rebublic Clinical Cancer Center, Kazan
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, Department of Oncology and Radiation Therapy, Kazan State Medical University, Republican Clinical Oncology Center of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Tatarstan (Kazan, Russia)
Scopus Author ID: 57194534032
ResearcherID: P-3359-2017
L. E. Ankhimova
Kazan State Medical University, Kazan
Russian Federation
6th student of the Faculty of Medicine, Kazan State Medical University (Kazan, Russia)
Russian Federation
6th student of the Faculty of Medicine, Kazan State Medical University (Kazan, Russia)
References
1. Arkhiri P.P., Stilidi I.S., Poddubnaya I.V., Nered S.N., Nikulin M.P., Bokhyan V.Yu., Abu-Khaydar O.B., Peregorodiev I.N., Melikov S.A., Tsymzhitova N.Ts. Efficacy of surgical treatment of patients with local ized gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Russian Cancer Journal. 2016; 21 (5): 233–237. [in Russian]
2. Joseph J.M., Farron A.M., Renella M., Gapany C. Can smaller scale conprehensive canser centers provide outstanding care in abdominal and thoracic pediatric solid tumor surgery? Results of a 14 year retrospective single center analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014; 21 (5): 1726–1731. doi: 10.1245/s10434 013 3455 y.
3. Medvediev M.V. Adhesive process in gynecology. Women’s health. 2015; 99 (3): 42 46. [in Russian]
4. Poroyskiy S.V., Poroyskaya A.V., Bulycheva O.S. Morphometric characteristics of the parietal and visceral peritoneum in the dynamics after various sizes surgical operation trauma application. Herald of Volgograd Medical University. 2014; 51 (3): 102–107. [in Russian]
5. Lavreshin P.M., Gobedgishvili V.K., Linchenko V.I., Gobedgishvili V.V., Zinchenko O.V., Kochkarov E.V., Hutov D.B. Application of “FAST TRACK” surgery elements for prevention of wound’s complications and intra abdominal adhesion after appendectomy. The Journal of scientific articles «Health and Education Millennium». 2017; 19(7): 44 47. [in Russian]
6. ten Broek R.P., Issa Y., van Santbrink E.J., Bouvy N.D., Kruitwagen R.F., Jeekel J., Bakkum E.A., Rovers M.M., van Goor H. Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met analysis. BMJ. 2013 Oct 3; 347: f5588. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5588.
7. Akhmetzyanov F.Sh., Egorov V.I. Optimization of Surgical Treat ment of Patients Undergoing Obstructive Colonic Resection. New of Surgery. 2017; 25 (5): 488–493. doi: 10.18484/2305 0047.2017.5.488 [in Russian]
8. Deikalo I.M., Bukaty V.V. Comparing the results of surgical treat ment of adhesive intestinal obstruction using open and laparoscopic technologies. Hospital surgery. Journal of L.A. Kovalchuk. 2016; (2): 85 88. [in Ukrainian]
9. Korobkov D.M. Acute intestinal obstruction – a modern vision of the mechanism of development and debated in the range of diagnostic and treatment policy. Bulletin of science and practice. 2016; 12 (13): 147–170. [in Russian]
10. Domoratsky A.E., Krylyuk V.O., Pavlenko A.I., Pyatkovskaya N.V., Sozansky V.V. Adhesive disease: the current state of the problem. Acute and urgent conditions in the practice of a doctor. 2016, 60–61 (3–4): 19–26. [in Russian]
11. Mais V. Peritoneal adhesions after laparascopic gastrointestinal surgery. World J Gastrointestirol. 2014; 20 (17): 4917–25. doi: 10.3748/ wjg.v20.i17.4917.
12. Sufiyarov I.F., Khasanov A.G., Nurtdinov M.A., Samorodov A.V., Jamalova G.R. High level of glycosaminoglycans of blood serumas an independent predictor of the developing peritoneum adhesive disease. Creative Surgery and Oncology. 2017; 7 (2): 48–53. doi: 10.24060/2076 3093 2017 7 2 48 53. [in Russian]
13. Kalashnikov A.V., Dvoretskaya Y.A. Comparative morphological analysis of intraperitoneal and interpleural adhesions. Volgograd journal of medical research. 2016; 53 (1): 24–28.[in Russian]
14. Poroyskiy S.V., Poroyskaya A.V. Postoperative endothelial dysfunc tion of peritoneal vessels and its effect of peritoneal function. Herald of modern clinical medicine. 2014; 7 (3): 55–60. [in Russian]
15. Kondratovich L.M., Kozachenko A.V., Kogan E.A., Faizullina N.M., Adamyan L.V. The clinical and morphological features of an adhesive process in patients with uterine myoma. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014; (8): 71–75. [in Russian]
16. Coccolini F., Ansaloni L., Manfredi R., Campanati L., Poiasina E., Bertoli P., Capponi M.G., Sartelli M., Di Saverio S., Cucchi M., Lazzares-chi D., Pisano M., Catena F. Peritoneal adhesion index (PAI): proposal of a score fo the “ignored iceberg” of medicine and surgery. World J Emerg Surg. 2013 Jan 31; 8 (1): 6. doi: 10.1186/1749 7922 8 6.
17. Filenko B.P., Zemlyanoy V.P., Borsak I.I., Ivanova A.S. Adhesive disease: Prevention and treatment. St. Petersburg, 2013. 171. [in Rus sian]
18. Kawanishi K., Yamato M., Sakiyama R. Peritoneal cell sheets composed of mesothelial cells and fibroblasts prevent intra abdominal adhesion formation in a rat model. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016 Oct; 10 (10): 855–866. doi: 10.1002/term.1860.
19. Ayushinova N.I., Shurygina I.A., Shurygin M.G., Glinskaya E.V. Assessment of adhesive process in abdominal cavity. Siberian Medical Journal (Irkutsk). 2014; 130 (7): 10–14. [in Russian]
20. Gain Yu.M., Demidchik Yu.E., Shakhrai S.V. Surgical diseases: symptoms and syndromes. Minsk, 2017. 480. [in Russian]
21. Vengerovich N.G., Khripunov A.K., Ruzanova E.A., Nikiforov A.S., Ivanov I.M., Tkachenko A.A. Research possibility of application bacterial cellulose during medical evacuation operation. Pharmacology. 2014; (15): 620–628. [in Russian]
22. Zhura A.V., Tratsyak S.I., Khryshchanovich V.J., Makarevich Z.A. Experimental model of peritoneal adhesion. News of Surgery. 2017; 25 (4): 333–339. doi: 10.1484/2305 0047.2017.4.333. [in Russian]
23. Nikolskiy V.I., Samorodova A.A., Titova E.V. Study of adhesions in the abdominal cavity rats after intra abdominal implantation combined herniaprosthesis. Fundamental researches. 2015; (1): 1204–1207. [in Russian]
24. Parshikov V.V., Mironov A.A., Kazantsev A.A., Alyokhin A.I. Visceral adhesions after Tension Free abdominal wall repair with ultra lightweight synthetic and titanium containing meshes. STM. 2017; 9 (3): 45–54. [in Russian]
25. Chistyakov D.B., Movchan K.N., Yashchenko A.C. The intensity of the formation of adhesions in the process of inra pominalnom strengthening of the abdominal wall in the experiment synthetic mesh implants different physical to chemical basis of the structure. Bulletin of the North West State Medical University. 2015; 7 (3): 29–37. [in Russian]
26. Kalugin A.S. Eunoplication. Minsk: 1976. 143. [in Russian]
27. Blinnikov O.I., Dronov A.F., Poddubny I.V. Laparoscopic surgery for acute adhesive intestinal obstruction in children. Surgery. 2001; (2): 37–42. [in Russian]
28. Matveev N.L., Arutyunyan D.Yu., Digaeva M.A. The results of use of 4% iodextrin solution for the prophylactics of abdominal adhesions after surgical and gynecological operations. Endoscopic surgery. 2008; 14 (3): 45–54. [in Russian]
29. Verukhletsky I.E., Verukhletsky E.I. Aspects of morphology and classification of adhesions in the abdominal cavity. Ukrainian Journal of Surgery. 2009; (3): 30–33. [in Russian]
30. Zhidkov S.A., Korik V.E., Zhidkov A.S., Orsic E.O. Assesment of the severity of the adhesion process. The young scientist. 2016; 114 (10): 483–486. [in Russian]
31. Di Saverio S., Coccolini F., Galati M., Smerieri N., Biffl W.L., Ansaloni L., Tugnoli G., Velmahos G.C., Sartelli M., Bendinelli C., Fraga G.P., Kelly M.D., Moore F.A., Mandalà V., Mandalà S., Masetti M., Jovine E., Pinna A.D., Peitzman A.B., Leppaniemi A., Sugarbaker P.H., Goor H.V., Moore E.E., Jeekel J., Catena F. Bologna guidelines for di agnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO); 2013 update of the evidence based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group. World J Emerg Surg. 2013; (8): 42. doi: 10.1186/1749 7922 8 42.
32. Rakic S., LeBlanc K.A. The radiologic appearance of prosthetic materials used in hernia repair and a recommended classification. AJR. 2013; 201 (6): 1180 1183. doi: 10.2224/AJR.13.10703.
33. Stepanyuk A.A., Zavada N.V., Gurevich A.R., Stepaniuk A.F. Modern approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of the adhesive pro cess of the abdominal cavity. Emergency medicine. 2014; 10 (2): 55–64. [in Russian]
34. Seriau L., Lauretta A., Infantino A. Abdominal Adhesions: From formation to prevention. Soc Ital Chir ColoRettale. 2013; 35: 289–300.
35. Zemlyanoy V.P., Filenko B.P., Kotkov P.A., Sigua B.V., Borsak I.I. Possibilities of diagnosis of abdominal adhesions at prehospital and inpa tient stages. Emergency. 2016; (1): 63–67 [in Russian]
36. Barnett R.E., Younga J., Harris B., Keskey R.C., Nisbett D., Perry J., Cheadle W.G. Accuracy of computed tomography in small bowel obstruc tion. Am Surg. 2013; 79 (6): 641–643.
37. Fenner J., Wright B., Emberey J., Spencer P., Gillott R., Summers A., Hutchinson C., Lawford P., Brenchley P., Bardhan K.D. Towards radiologi cal diagnosis of abdominal adhesions based on motion signatures derived from sequences of cine MRI images. Phys Med. 2014 Jun; 30 (4): 437–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.12.002.
38. Azzam A.Z., Yousef S.M. Periumbilical ultrasonic guided saline infusion technique (PUGSI): A step for safer laparascopy on high risk patients for adhesions. Middle East Fertility Soc J. 2013; 18: 182–186. doi: 10.1016/j.mefs.2013.03.003.
39. Tabibian N., Swehli E., Boyd A., Umbreen A., Tabibian J.H. Abdominal adhesions: A practical review of an often overlooked en tity. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Jan 31; 15: 9–13. doi: 10.1016/j. amsu.2017.01.021.
40. Tikhonov V.I., Plotnikov M.B., Logvinov S.V., Grishchenko M.Yu., Shkatov D.A. Influence of the antioxidant complex on the adhesion pro cesses in the experiment. Questions of reconstructive and plastic surgery. 2014; 48 (1): 31–40. [in Russian]
41. Feskov A.E., Gavrikov A.E. Peritoneal adhesions: pathogenesis and prophylaxis. News of medicine and pharmacy. 2014; 522 (20): 14–16. [in Russian]
42. Almabaev Y.Y., Kyzhyrov Zh.N., Akzholova N.D., Fakhradiev I.R., Baimakhanov B.B., Abildaev D.A., Balgabayeva A.M., Isahanova U.I., Meukenova E.B., Kazieva A.M., Kaldybek M.M., Serikykzy L., Altai M.M. To the issue of prevention of adhesions. Science and peace. 2016; 31 (3): 70–72. [in Russian]
43. Nasrtdinov I.G., Ishkinin R.E., Garipov I.I. Antiseptic methods of abdominal cavity treatment. New science: problems and prospects. 2016; (4–2): 30–33. [in Russian]
44. Lipatov V.A. The concept of prophylaxis of postoperative adhesions of the abdominal cavity with the use of barrier means (experimental and clinical study). Kursk, 2013. 219. [in Russian]
45. Boyko V.V., Evtushenko D.A. The method of preventing adhesion in previously operated patients on the organs of the abdominal cavity. Innovations in science. 2013; 25: 177–181. [in Russian]
46. Samartsev V.A., Kuznetsova M.V., Gavrilov V.A., Kuznetsova M.P., Parshakov A.A. Antiadhesion barriers in abdominal surgery: the current state of the problem. Perm medical journal. 2017; 34 (2): 87–93. [in Russian]
47. Plechev V.V., Latypov R.Z., Timerbulatov V.M. Surgery of peritoneal adhesion (guideline). Ufa, 2015; 748. [in Russian]
48. Saed G.M., Fletcher N.M., Diamond M.P. The Creation of a Model for Ex Vivo Development of Postoperative Adhesions. Reprod Sci. 2016 May; 23 (5): 610–612. doi: 10.1177/1933719115607997.
49. Mamatov N.N., Sopuyev A.A., Abdiev A.Sh., Akmatov T.A., Sydykov N.Zh., Ovcharenko K.E. Evaluation of the effectiveness of intra operative ointment prophylaxis of adhesive disease of the abdominal cavity. Modern problems of science and education. 2013; 5: 340–347. [in Russian].
50. Meshkova O.A., Bogdanova D.Yu., Matveev N.L., Kurganov I.A. The use of modern antiseptic drugs in surgery. Endoscopic surgery. 2015; 21 (3): 37–42. doi: 10.17116/endoskop201521337 42 [in Russian].
51. Shurygina I.A., Ayushinov N.I., Shurygin M.G. Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of Adept application for the prevention of adhesion in the abdominal cavity in the experiment. Experimental surgery. Surgery news. 2017; 25 (1): 14–19. [in Russian]
52. Poehnert D., Grethe L., Maegel L., Jonigk D., Lippmann T., Kaltenborn A., Schrem H., Klempnauer J., Winny M. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Peritoneal Adhesion Prevention Devices in a Rat Model. Int J Med Sci. 2016 Jun 30; 13 (7): 524–32. doi: 10.7150/ijms.15167.
53. Klink C.D., Schickhaus P., Binnebösel M., Jockenhoevel S., Rosch R., Tolba R., Neumann U.P., Klinge U. Influence of 4% icodextrin solution on peritoneal tissue response and adhesion formation. BMC Surg. 2013 Sep 10; 13: 34. doi: 10.1186/1471 2482 13 34.
54. Almabaev Y.A., Fakhradiev I.R., Akzholova N.D. Antisephalic barrier means. Science and peace. 2016; 1: 65–68. [in Russian]
55. Arslan E., Irkorucu O., Sozutek A., Cetinkunar S., Reyhan E., Yaman A., Doran F. The potential efficacy of Survanta and Seprafilm on preventing intra abdominal adhesions in rats. Acta Cirúrg Brasil. 2016; 31 (6): 389. doi:10.1590/S0102 865020160060000005.
56. Naito M., Ogura N., Yamanashi T., Sato T., Nakamura T., Miura H., Tsutsui A., Sakamoto Y., Tanaka R., Kumagai Y., Watanabe M. Prospective randomized controlled study on the validity and safety of an absorbable adhesion barrier (Interceed®) made of oxidized regenerated cellulose for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2017 Feb; 10 (1): 7–11. doi: 10.1111/ases.12334.
57. Aliev S.R., Siluyanov S.V. The first experience of using an anti collagen collagen membrane in operations on the abdominal and pelvic organs. Breast cancer. 2015; (13): 789. [in Russian]
58. Gorsky V.A., Sivkov A.S., Agapov M.A., Titkov B.E., Shadsky S.O. The first experience of intra abdominal use of a single layered collagen plate. Surgery. 2015; 5: 64–66. [in Russian]
Review
For citations:
Akhmetzyanov F.Sh., Egorov V.I., Ankhimova L.E. ADHESIVE PROCESS AS A PROBLEM OF ONCOLOGY ABDOMINAL OPERATIVE SURGERY. Siberian journal of oncology. 2018;17(2):95-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2018-17-2-95-103
Views:
4144
Email this article 
