Functional results and quality of life after oral cavity reconstruction using autografts

The purpose of the study was to conduct a comparative analysis and evaluate the functional results and quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer after radical surgery, depending on the reconstruction techniques used and the feasibility of using autografts for the repair of tissue innervation. Material and Methods. From 2014 to 2021a total of 133 patients with oral cavity cancer underwent simultaneous or delayed reconstruction after radical surgery at Clinical Hospital 1 of Sechenov University. All patients were divided into 4 groups: group 1 (n=37, the main group): reconstruction with free flaps “with reinnervation”, group 2 (n=24): reconstruction with free flaps “without reinnervation”, group 3 (n=23): reconstruction with pedicled axial flaps “with innervation”, and group 4 (n=49): reconstruction with pedicled axial flaps “without innervation”. The QLQ-H&N43 questionnaire was taken as the main tool, speech and swallowing functions were assessed by using scales, and sensibility was assessed by the Semmes-Weinstein and Weber tests, as well as by pain and temperature sensation. Results. In the main group, statistically significant best results were achieved in the following main scales of the QLQ-H&N43 questionnaire: total score - Me=21 (Q1-9; Q3-29) (p=0.038); speech -Me=27 (Q1-7; Q3-37) (p=0.05) and body image - Me=22 (Q1-0; Q3-47) (p=0.049). In group 1, significantly better results were obtained in assessing all sensory tests, except for the temperature sensation. In relation to less discomfort on the donor area and greater satisfaction with the cosmetic result, group 1 also gained better scores than other groups. Conclusion. The use of innervated flaps improves the quality of life and patient satisfaction with the treatment results in long-term follow-up.

1. Davudov M.M., Harirchi I., Arabkheradmand A., Garajei A., Mirzajani Z., Amiraliyev K., Rustamli N., Zebardast J., Montazeri A. Quality of life in patients with oral cancer treated by different reconstruction methods as measured by the EORTC QLQ-H&N43. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 58(9): 67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.06.027.

2. Rathod S., Livergant J., Klein J., Witterick I., Ringash J. A systematic review of quality of life in head and neck cancer treated with surgery with or without adjuvant treatment. Oral Oncol. 2015; 51(10): 888-900. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.07.002.

3. Reshetov I.V., Zakirova A.A. Comparative analysis of oral cavity organ reconstruction methods with axial and free innervated flaps. Head and neck. Russian Journal. 2022; 10(1): 69-75. (in Russian). doi: 10.25792/HN.2022.10.1.69-75.

4. Li W., Yang Y., Xu Z., Liu F., Cheng Y., Xu L., Sun C. Assessment of quality of life of patients with oral cavity cancer who have had defects reconstructed with free anterolateral thigh perforator flaps. Br J Oral Maxil-lofac Surg. 2013; 51(6): 497-501. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.09.005.

5. Valdez J.A., Brennan M.T. Impact of Oral Cancer on Quality of Life. Dent Clin North Am. 2018; 62(1): 143-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2017.09.001.

6. Chizhevskaya S.Yu., Choinzonov E.L., Balatskaya L.N. Quality of life in patients with laryngeal and laryngopharyngeal cancer in short-and long-term follow-up. Siberian Journal of Oncology. 2015; 1(2): 15-22. (in Russian).

7. Pingili S., Ahmed J., Sujir N., Shenoy N., Ongole R. Evaluation of Malnutrition and Quality of Life in Patients Treated for Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer. Scientific WorldJournal. 2021: 9936715. doi: 10.1155/2021/9936715.

8. Meier J.K., Schuderer J.G., Zeman F, Klingelhoffer C., Hullmann M., Spanier G., Reichert T.E., Ettl T. Health-related quality of life: a retrospective study on local vs. microvascular reconstruction in patients with oral cancer. BMC Oral Health. 2019; 19(1): 62. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0760-2.

9. Spiegel J.L., Pilavakis Y., Weiss B.G., Canis M., Welz C. Quality of life in patients after reconstruction with the supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) versus the radial free forearm flap (RFFF). Eur Arch Otorhi-nolaryngol. 2019; 276(8): 2311-8. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05478-6.

10. Bozec A., Demez P., Gal J., Chamorey E., Louis M.Y., Blanchard D., De Raucourt D., Merol J.C., Brenet E., Dassonville O., Poissonnet G., Santini J., Peyrade F, Benezery K., Lesnik M., Berta E., Ransy P., Babin E. Long-term quality of life and psycho-social outcomes after oropharyngeal cancer surgery and radial forearm free-flap reconstruction: A GETTEC prospective multicentric study. Surg Oncol. 2018; 27(1): 23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2017.11.005.

11. Wilson M.K., Collyar D., Chingos D.T., Friedlander M., Ho T.W., Karakasis K., Kaye S., Parmar M.K., Sydes M.R., Tannock I.F., Oza A.M. Outcomes and endpoints in cancer trials: bridging the divide. Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16(1): 43-52. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70380-8.

12. KulbakinDE., ChoinzonovE.L.,MukhamedovM.R., GarbukovE.U., Shtin V.I., Havkin N.M., Vasilev R.V. Modern principles of reconstructive surgery for advanced head and neck tumors. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2017; 1882(1). doi: 10.1063/1.5001618.

13. Roux M., Dassonville O., Ettaiche M., Poissonnet G., Sudaka A., Bozec A. Transoral-transcervical oropharyngectomy without mandibulotomy, associated to fasciocutaneous radial forearm free-flap reconstruction, for oropharyngeal cancer: Postoperative course, oncologic and functional results, and prognostic factors. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2017; 134(2): 71-6. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2016.11.004.

14. Wang S., Yin S., Zhang Z.L., Su X., Xu Z.F. Quality of Life After Oral Cancer Resection and Free Flap Reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 77(8): 1724-32. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.02.029.

15. Hanasono M.M., Friel M.T., Klem C., Hsu P.W., Robb G.L., Weber R.S., Roberts D.B., Chang D.W. Impact of reconstructive microsurgery in patients with advanced oral cavity cancers. Head Neck. 2009; 31(10): 1289-96. doi: 10.1002/hed.21100.

16. Hsing C.Y., Wong Y.K., Wang C.P., Wang C.C., Jiang R.S., Chen F.J., Liu S.A. Comparison between free flap and pectoralis major pedicled flap for reconstruction in oral cavity cancer patients-a quality of life analysis. Oral Oncol. 2011; 47(6): 522-7. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.03.024.

17. Chepeha D. B., Annich G., Pynnonen M. A., Beck J., Wolf G. T., Teknos T. N., Bradford C. R., Carroll W. R., Esclamado, R. M. Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap vs revascularized free tissue transfer: complications, gastrostomy tube dependence, and hospitalization. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(2):181-6. doi:10.1001/archotol.130.2.181.

18. Manrique O.J., Leland H.A., Langevin C.J., Wong A., Carey J.N., Ciudad P., Chen H.C., Patel K.M. Optimizing Outcomes following Total and Subtotal Tongue Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of the Contemporary Literature. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017; 33(2): 103-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593772.

19. Yu P. Reinnervated anterolateral thigh flap for tongue reconstruction. Head Neck. 2004; 26(12): 1038-44. doi: 10.1002/hed.20106.

20. Galie E., Vllani V, Ferrel F., Pace A., Pellini R. Vastus lateralis myofascial free flap for tongue reconstruction and hypoglossal-femoral anastomosis: neurophysiological study. Neurol Sci. 2019; 40(3): 553-9. doi: 10.1007/s10072-018-3687-5.

21. WarshavskyA., Fliss D.M., Frenkel G., KupershmidtA., MoavN., Rosen R., Sechter M., Shapira U., Abu-Ghanem S., Yehuda M., Zaretski A., Yanko-Arzi R., Reiser V., Horowitz G. Quality of life after mandibulectomy: the impact of the resected subsite. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 48(10): 1273-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.02.013.

22. Niyazov I.K., Sanginov D.R., Khuseynzoda Z.Kh., Bazarov N.I. Influence of plastic and reconstructive surgery on the quality of life of patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. Avicenna Bulletin. 2021; 23(1): 46-52. (in Russian). doi: 10.25005/2074-0581-2021-23-1-46-52.