Rehabilitation and quality of life of patients after arthroplasty for malignant bone tumors of the upper limb

Arthroplasty is the most widely used surgical technique for bone tumors of the upper limbs. However, it should be noted that the functional outcomes after endoprosthetic reconstruction for malignant bone tumors of the upper limb does not always satisfy patients and often lead to impaired working capacity of patients, and their disability. The need to improve functional outcomes determines the practical and socio-economic significance of the research. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of a complex of rehabilitation measures on the quality of life of patients after surgery with endoprosthetic reconstruction for malignant bone tumors of the upper limb. Material and Methods. The treatment and rehabilitation outcomes in 146 patients were analyzed. There were 88 (60 %) men and 58 (40 %) women with an average age of 47 years (range, 19–75 years). The tumor was localized in the proximal humerus in 98 (67 %) patients, in the diaphysis in 18 (12 %), in bones that make up the elbow joint in 16 (11 %) and in the distal radius in 14 (9.6 %) patients. Results. Our rehabilitation technique improved functional outcomes after endoprosthetic reconstruction for all tumor localizations. The musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was improved by 10 % (75 vs 65 %) for arthroplasty of the shoulder joint, for the wrist joint by 8 (80 vs 72 %). The rehabilitation technique allowed significant improvement of MSTS score for arthroplasty of the humeral diaphysis and bones making up the elbow joint (from 76 to 95 % and from 68 to 82 %, respectively). Conclusion. Rehabilitation measures play an important role in optimizing quality of life of patients after surgical treatment of bone tumors of the upper limb with arthroplasty, helping to improve functional outcomes.

1. Cancer care for the population of Russia in 2019. Ed. by A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinsky, A.O. Shakhzadova. Moscow, 2020. 239 p. (in Russian).

2. Bukharov A.V., Derzhavin V.A., Yadrina A.V., Erin E.A., Elkhov D.O., Aliev M.D., Kaprin A.D. Surgical treatment of patients with bone metastases. Clinical and Experimental Surgery. Petrovsky journal. 2022; 10(3): 100–7. (in Russian). doi: 10.33029/2308-1198-2022-10-3-100-107.

3. Aliev M.D. Onco-orthopedics yesterday, today, tomorrow. Bulletin of the Cancer Society. 2013; 5(598): 3–4. (in Russian).

4. Bukharov A.V., Derzhavin V.A., Golubev P.V., Yadrina A.V. Treatment of patients with metastatic lesions of the long bones. Surgery. Pirogov Journal of Surgery. 2021; (5): 89–94. (in Russian). doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202105189.

5. Ehne J., Tsagozis P. Current concepts in the surgical treatment of skeletal metastases. World J Orthop. 2020; 11(7): 319–27. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i7.319.

6. Hennessy D.W., Raskin K.A., Schwab J.H., Lozano-Calderón S.A. Endoprosthetic Reconstruction of the Upper Extremity in Oncologic Surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020; 28(8): 319–27. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00219.

7. Ivanov V.E., Kurilchik A.A., Starodubtsev A.L., Zubarev A.L., Gumenetskaya Yu.V. Rehabilitation of bone cancer patients after endoprosthetic replacement of large joints. Proceedings of the first international forum of oncology and radiology, September 23–28, 2018, Moscow. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2018; 5(2s): 194. (in Russian).

8. Stepanova A.M. The practical recommendations for the rehabilitation of oncorthopedic patients: review. Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical Rehabilitation. 2019; 3: 73–8. (in Russian). doi: 10.36425/2658-6843-2019-3-73-78.

9. Bukharov A.V., Filonenko E.V., Erin D.A., Derzhavin V.A., Yadrina A.V., Shatalov A.M., Elkhov D.O., Aliev M.D. Early rehabilitation of cancer patients after endoprosthetic reconstruction following resection of the lower extremity long bones. Siberian Journal of Oncology. 2022; 21(5): 142–8. (in Russian). doi: 10.21294/1814-4861-2022-21-5-142-148.

10. Marchese V.G., Spearing E., Callaway L., Rai S.N., Zhang L., Hinds P.S., Carlson C.A., Neel M.D., Rao B.N., Ginsberg J. Relationships among range of motion, functional mobility, and quality of life in children and adolescents after limb-sparing surgery for lower-extremity sarcoma. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2006; 18(4): 238–44. doi: 10.1097/01.pep.0000232620.42407.9f.

11. Wampler M.A., Galantino M.L., Huang S., Gilchrist L.S., Marchese V.G., Morris G.S., Scalzitti D.A., Hudson M.M., Oeffinger K.C., Stovall M., Leisenring W.M., Armstrong G.T., Robison L.L., Ness K.K. Physical activity among adult survivors of childhood lower-extremity sarcoma. J Cancer Surviv. 2012; 6(1): 45–53. doi: 10.1007/s11764-011-0187-5.

12. Nagarajan R., Kamruzzaman A., Ness K.K., Marchese V.G., Sklar C., Mertens A., Yasui Y., Robison L.L., Marina N. Twenty years of follow-up of survivors of childhood osteosarcoma: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Cancer. 2011; 117(3): 625–34. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25446.

13. Elkhov D.O., Erin D.A., Bukharov A.V., Filonenko E.V., Derzhavin V.A., Yadrina A.V., Shatalov A.M. Functional results in the surgical treatment of a tumor lesion of the proximal humerus with endoprosthetics. Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas, Tumors of the Skin. 2022; 14(3): 20–5. (in Russian)]. doi: 10.17650/2219-4614-2022-14-3-20-25.

14. Enneking W.F., Dunham W., Gebhardt M.C., Malawar M., Pritchard D.J. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; (286): 241–6.

15. Kaprin А.D., Aliev M.D., Filonenko E.V., Stepanova A.M., Bukharov A.V., Erin D.A. Efficiency of Early Activation of Patients аft er Onco-Orthopedic Operations in the Framework of Stage I of Rehabilitation. Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical Rehabilitation. 2021; 3(2): 207–13. (in Russian). doi: 10.36425/rehab70762.

16. Grushina T.I., Teplyakov V.V. Physiotherapy in the early rehabilitation of patients with bone sarcomas after endoprosthetic replacement of large bones and joints. Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation. 2018; 17(4): 192–8. (in Russian).

17. Nelson C.M., Marchese V., Rock K., Henshaw R.M., Addison O Alterations in Muscle Architecture: A Review of the Relevance to Individuals After Limb Salvage Surgery for Bone Sarcoma. Front Pediatr. 2020; 8: 292. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00292.

18. Janssen S.J., van Rein E.A., Paulino Pereira N.R., Raskin K.A., Ferrone M.L., Hornicek F.J., Lozano-Calderon S.A., Schwab J.H. The Discrepancy between Patient and Clinician Reported Function in Extremity Bone Metastases. Sarcoma. 2016. doi: 10.1155/2016/1014248.

19. Guzik G. The Use of a Custom-made Prosthesis in the Treatment of Chondrosarcoma of Distal Radius. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2016; 18(1): 65–72. doi: 10.5604/15093492.1198866.

20. Mikailov I.M., Grigoriev P.V., Ptashnikov D.A., Maykov S.V. Results of the proximal humerus endoprosthetic reconstruction after tumour resection. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2014; 20(4): 27–35. (in Russian). doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2014-0-4-27-35.

21. McGrath A., Sewell M.D., Hanna S.A., Pollock R.C., Skinner J.A., Cannon S.R., Briggs T.W. Custom endoprosthetic reconstruction for malignant bone disease in the humeral diaphysis. Acta Orthop Belg. 2011; 77(2): 171–9.

22. Capanna R., Muratori F., Campo F.R., D’Arienzo A., Frenos F., Beltrami G., Scoccianti G., Cuomo P., Piccioli A., Müller D.A. Modular megaprosthesis reconstruction for oncological and non-oncological resection of the elbow joint. Injury. 2016; 47s4: 78–83. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.07.041.

23. Hatano H., Morita T., Kobayashi H., Otsuka H. A ceramic prosthesis for the treatment of tumours of the distal radius. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88(12): 1656–8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B12.17989.

24. Gokaraju K., Sri-Ram K., Donaldson J., Parratt M.T.R., Blunn G.W., Cannon S.R., Briggs T.W.R. Use of a distal radius endoprosthesis following resection of a bone tumor. Sarcoma. 2009. doi: 10.1155/2009/938295.