DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION IN PREOPERATIVE STAGING OF DISSEMINATED OVARIAN CANCER
https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2016-15-4-26-32
Abstract
The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of the optimized ultrasound technique with the use of additional methods (change in the patient’s body position, forced type of breath and abdominal scanning with high-frequency probes) for assessing the preoperative staging in 47 patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer. It was shown that the optimized ultrasound technique, especially in cases with low-volume ascites, allowed improvement in preoperative staging of ovarian cancer, with sensitivity of 87%.
About the Authors
N. V. Vyatkina
Tomsk Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk
Russian Federation
Vyatkina Nina V., postgraduate, Diagnostic Imaging Department
Russian Federation
Vyatkina Nina V., postgraduate, Diagnostic Imaging Department
I. G. Frolova
Tomsk Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Frolova Irina G., MD, Professor, Head of the Diagnostic Imaging Department
SPIN-code: 9800-9777
L. A. Kolomiets
Tomsk Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk;
Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kolomiets Larisa A., MD, Professor, Honored Science Worker of Russian Federation, Head of Department of Gynecology with the Group of Cancer Prevention, Tomsk Cancer Research Institute
SPIN-код: 6316-1146
S. V. Molchanov
Tomsk Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Molchanov Sergey V., MD, PhD, Researcher, Department of Gynecology with the Group of Cancer Prevention
SPIN-code: 2719-3289
A. B. Villert
Tomsk Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Villert Alisa B., MD, PhD, Senior Researcher, Department of Gynecology with the Group of Cancer Prevention
SPIN-code: 1975-0042
References
1. Axel Е.М. Statistics of the female genital tract cancer. Gynecological oncology; 1: 18–23. [in Russian]
2. Antoneeva I.I., Gening Т.P., Abakumova Т.V. Diagnostic algorithm of progressive ovarian cancer. Medical Almanac. 2012; 4: 29–31. [in Russian]
3. Zhordanina К.I., Khokhlova S.V. Early ovarian cancer. Our view on the problem. Gynecological oncology. 2012; 1: 51–58. [in Russian]
4. Novikova Е.G. Novel approaches to treatment of ovarian sarcoma and cancer. // www Medlinks.ru. Oncology and Hematology. 2011. [in Russian]
5. Jemal A., Siegel R., Xu J., Ward E. Cancer statistic, 2010. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2010; 60 (5): 277–300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073.
6. Ashrafyan L.А., Antonova I.B., Ivashina S.V., Lyustic А.V. Early detection of endometrial and ovarian cancers. Practical Oncology. 2009; 10 (2): 71–75. [in Russian]
7. Sinitsina М.Е., Chekalova М.А., Bryuzgin V.V., Makhova Е.Е. The role of ultrasound in evaluating approaches to ovarian cancer treatment. Tumors of the female reproductive system: scientific-practical journal. 2008; 4: 72–76. [in Russian]
8. Takur A., Mishra V., Jain S.K. Feed Forward Artificial Neural Network: Tool for Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer. Sci Pharm. 2011; 79 (3): 493–505. doi: 10.3797/scipharm.1105-11.
9. Villert А.B., Kolomiets L.А., Rodicheva N.S., Ivanova А.А., Cherdyntseva N.V., Stukanov S.L. Features of ovarian cancer in patients with BRCA1 5382insC mutation. Siberian Journal of Oncology. 2014; 6: 19–26. [in Russian]
10. Molchanov S.V., Kolomiets L.А. Disseminated ovarian cancer: current approach to drug therapy (published literature review). Siberian Journal of Oncology. 2015; 6: 68–75. [in Russian]
11. Molchanov S.V., Kolomiets L.А., Frolova I.G., Vyatkina N.V., Baklanova N.S. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer: echosemiotics, classification. // Herald of the N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, RAMS. 2014. Vol. 25, № 1–2: 14–21. [in Russian]
12. Prokopenko P.G., Terenyev А.А. Ovarian tumors: some features of evolution, prevalence and diagnostics. Problems of oncology. 2009; 55 (2): 143–150. [in Russian]
13. Chekalova М.А., Poddubnaya I.V., Mazyrko М.А., Sinitsina М.Е. The role of ultrasound in planning treatment for malignant epithelial ovarian tumors. Current oncology. 2007; Т. 9, № 1: 66–70. [in Russian]
14. Vostrov А.N., Stepanov S.О., Korneeva I.А. History and current trends in using ultrasound examination for ovarian cancer. Diagnostic imaging and therapy. 2013; 3 (4): 22–28. [in Russian]
15. Stepanov S.О., Mitina L.А., Guts О.V., Bespalov P.D. Visualization of peritoneal dissemination during ultrasound examination. Diagnostic imaging and therapy. 2013; 3 (4): 66–70. [in Russian]
16. Boldogoeva I.М., Berzin S.А. Current capabilities for diagnosing ovarian cancer in cancer centers / Ed. by S.M. Demidov. Ekaterinburg; 2007: P. 34–52. [in Russian]
Review
For citations:
Vyatkina N.V., Frolova I.G., Kolomiets L.A., Molchanov S.V., Villert A.B. DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION IN PREOPERATIVE STAGING OF DISSEMINATED OVARIAN CANCER. Siberian journal of oncology. 2016;15(4):26-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2016-15-4-26-32
Views:
1040
Email this article 
