Preview

Siberian journal of oncology

Advanced search

ASSESSMENT OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS CONSIDERING THE VOLUME OF SKELETAL METASTASIS IN PATIENTS WITH DISSEMINATED PROSTATE CANCER

https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2017-16-1-39-44

Abstract

Purpose. To determine the correlation between prognostic factors (age, differentiation grade assessed using the Gleason scoring system, serum prostate specific antigen, prostate volume, and serum testosterone) and the volume of skeletal metastasis expressed as bone metastasis index (BMI) in patients with disseminated prostate cancer (DPC). Material and methods. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 157 patients with initially diagnosed DPC treated at the Khabarovsk Regional Cancer Center from 2003 to 2013. Bone metastases were revealed in all patients. The volume of skeletal metastasis was measured using a novel automated computeraided diagnosis system devised by the specialists of Computer Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Results. The patients were divided into four groups. Group1: BMI≤1 % and Gleason score≤5; group 2: BMI ≤1 % and Gleason Score≥3; group 3: BMI>1 % and Gleason score≤5; group 4: BMI>1 % and Gleason score>5. The median survival time was 48 months in group 1 patients, 36.5 months in group 2, 33 months in group 3 and 20 months in group 4 patients. Both log-rank and Wilcoxon tests demonstrated a statistically significant difference in survival curves between the groups 1 and 3, and between the groups 2 and 4. There was also a difference in differentiation grade assessed by the Gleason score system between these two pairs of groups. Correlation of other prognostic factors, such as age, serum prostate specific antigen, prostate volume, and serum testosterone with the volume of skeletal metastasis demonstrated that BMI predominantly influenced the survival of prostate cancer patients. Conclusion. The assessment of prognostic factors allowed the patients’ groups with the worst prognosis to be identified. The bone metastasis index and differentiation grade of the tumor appeared to be independent predictors of high death risk in patients with disseminated prostate cancer.

About the Authors

N. E. Kosyh
Computer Center FEB RAS
Russian Federation

MD, DSc, Leading Researcher, Medical Informatics Laboratory, Computer Center, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

SPIN-code: 7733-7038



A. V. Eremenko
Regional Clinical Cancer Centre
Russian Federation

MD, physician-oncologist, Regional Clinical Oncology Center

SPIN-code: 8670-2127.



S. Z. Savin
Computer Center FEB RAS
Russian Federation

PhD, Head of Medical Informatics Laboratory, Computer Center, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

SPIN-code: 8241-1541.



References

1. Matzkin H., Perito P.E., Soloway M.S. Prognostic factors in metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer. 1993 Dec 15; 72 (12 Suppl): 3788–92.

2. Coleman R.E. Metastatic bone disease: clinical features, pathophysiology and treatment strategies. Cancer Treat Rev. 2001 Jun; 27 (3): 165–76. doi: 10.1053/ctrv.2000.0210.

3. Cayla J., Basset J.Y. Bone scintigraphy in metastases. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic. 1986 May; 53 (5): 317–23.

4. Erdi Y.E., Humm J.L., Imbriaco M., Yeung H., Larson S.M. Quantitative bone metastases analysis based on image segmentation. J Nucl Med. 1997 Sep; 38 (9): 1401–6.

5. Buhmeida A., Pyrhönen S., Laato M., Collan Y. Prognostic factors in prostate cancer. Diagnostic Pathology. 2006; 1: 4. doi: 10.1186/1746- 1596-1-4.

6. Coleman R.E. Metastatic bone disease: clinical features, pathophysiology and treatment strategies. Cancer Treat Rev. 2001 Jun; 27 (3): 165–76. doi: 10.1053/ctrv.2000.0210.

7. Erdi Y.E., Humm J.L., Imbriaco M., Yeung H., Larson S.M. Quantitative bone metastases analysis based on image segmentation. J Nucl Med. 1997 Sep; 38 (9): 1401–6.

8. Gostyushkin V.V., Kosykh N.E., Savin S.Z. Supercomputers in nuclear medicine problems. Khabarovsk: Computer Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2013; 163 p. [in Russian]

9. Savin S.Z, Kosykh N.E., Vlasenko V.D. The technology of determining the volume of skeletal metastasis according to findings of planar scintigraphy [Internet]. [cited 2016 May 25]. Available from: http://conf.nsc.ru/ files/conferences/MIT2013 /fulltext/146609/150094/Savin_Kosykh_Vlasenko (statya).pdf. (дата обращения: 08.06.2016). [in Russian]

10. Kosykh N.E., Litvinov К.А., Kovalenko V.L., Eremenko А.V. Automated computer-aided analysis of planar bone scintigramms for determining the volume of skeletal metastasis. Дальневосточный медицинский журнал. 2013; 3: 32–34. [in Russian]

11. Worldwide Offices & Representatives. The MathWorks, Inc. [Internet]. [cited 2016 May 25]. Available from: http://www.mathworks. com/company/worldwide.

12. Kosykh N.E., Smagin S.I., Gostyushkin V.V, Savin S.Z., Litvinov К.А. System of automated computer-based analysis of medical images. Information technology and computer systems. 2011; 3: 51–56. [in Russian]

13. Statistica v7.0.61.0 [Internet]. [cited 2016 May 25]. Available from: http://www.statsoft.ru.


Review

For citations:


Kosyh N.E., Eremenko A.V., Savin S.Z. ASSESSMENT OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS CONSIDERING THE VOLUME OF SKELETAL METASTASIS IN PATIENTS WITH DISSEMINATED PROSTATE CANCER. Siberian journal of oncology. 2017;16(1):39-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2017-16-1-39-44

Views: 1089


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1814-4861 (Print)
ISSN 2312-3168 (Online)