Preview

Siberian journal of oncology

Advanced search

ACCELERATED HOSPITAL REHABILITATION OF PATIENTS AFTER EXTENDED-COMBINED SURGERIES FOR CANCER OF THORACIC ESOPHAGUS AND CARDIA

Abstract

The efficacy of the protocol of preoperative preparation and accelerated rehabilitation of patients in surgical treatment of thoracic esophageal cancer was aevaluated. The protocol was based on the analysis of short-term results of surgical treatment of 190 patients with esophageal cancer. The algorithm devised at the Moscow Research Institute of Oncology was applied to 30 patients with cancer of the esophagus and cardia. Postoperative complications occurred in 12 (40 %) patients of the study group including surgical complications in 4 patients (chylothorax – 2, failure of the esophageal-intestinal anastomosis – 1, small bowel obstruction – 1). Nonsurgical complications in the absence of surgical ones were noted in 7 patients (pneumonia – 6, heart rhythm disturbances – 1). No lethal outcomes were registered. Patients in the control retrospective group (n=50) underwent surgeries in the same extent after the standard preoperative preparation. Postoperative complications in the control group occurred in 28 (48 %) cases, 4 (8 %) patients died. The median postoperative hospital stay was 11 days (range: 10–29 days) in the study group and 18 days in the control group. Accordingly, the above protocol of preoperative examination and preparation of patients allows the frequency of  postoperative complications and lethality to be significantly decreased, thus reducing the hospital stay.

About the Authors

E. E. Volkova
P.A. Gertsen Moscow Research Institute of Oncology of the Ministry of Health and Social Development
Russian Federation


L. A. Vashakmadze
P.A. Gertsen Moscow Research Institute of Oncology of the Ministry of Health and Social Development
Russian Federation


V. M. Khomyakov
P.A. Gertsen Moscow Research Institute of Oncology of the Ministry of Health and Social Development
Russian Federation


A. S. Mamontov
P.A. Gertsen Moscow Research Institute of Oncology of the Ministry of Health and Social Development
Russian Federation


References

1. Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland. Guidelines for implementation of enhanced recovery protocols. Issues in professional practice, 2009.

2. Cerfolio R.J., Bryant A.S., Bass C.S. et al. Fast tracking after Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy // Chest. 2004. Vol. 126. P. 1187–1194.

3. Griffin S.M., Shaw I.H., Dresner S.M. Early complications after Ivor Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy: risk factors and management // J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2002. Vol. 194. P. 285–297.

4. Hofstetter W., Swisher S.G., Correa A.M. et al. Treatment outcomes of resected esophageal cancer // Ann. Surg. 2002. Vol. 236. P. 376–384.

5. Karl R.C., Schreiber R., Boulware D. et al. Factors affecting morbidity, mortality, and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy // Ann. Surg. 2000. Vol. 231. P. 635–643.

6. Kehlet H., Willmore D.W. Multi-modal strategies to improve surgical outcome // Amer. J. Surg. 2002. Vol. 183. P. 600.

7. Kehlet H.,Wilmore D.W. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery // Ann. Surg. 2008. Vol. 248 (2). P. 189–198.

8. Kehlet H.,Wilmore D.W. Fast-track surgery // Br. J. Surg. 2005. Vol. 92. P. 3–4.

9. Ke Jiang, Lin Cheng, Jian-Jun Wang et al. Fast track clinical pathway implications in esophagogastrectomy // World J. Gastroenterol. 2009. Vol. 15 (4). P. 496–501.

10. Low D., Kunz S., Schembre D. et al. Esophagectomy – it’s not just about mortality anymore: standardized perioperative clinical pathways improve outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer // J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2007. Vol. 11 (11). P. 1395–1402.

11. Luketich J.D., Alvelo-Rivera M., Buenaventura P.O. et al. Minimallyinvasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients // Ann. Surg. 2003. Vol. 238. P. 486–494.

12. Meakins, J.L. Innovations in surgery: the rules of evidence // Am. J. Surg. 2002. Vol. 183. P. 399–405.

13. Munitiz V., Martinez-de-Haro L.F., Ortiz A. et al. Effectiveness of a written clinical pathway for enhanced recovery after transthoracic (Ivor Lewis) oesophagectomy // Br. J. Surg. 2010. Vol. 97. P. 714–718.

14. Nguyen N.T., Hinojosa M.W., Smith B.R. et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations // Ann. Surg. 2008. Vol. 248. P. 1081–1091.

15. Roig-Garcıa J., Girones-Vila J., Garsot-Savall E. et al. Transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy using minimally invasive techniques. Experience in 50 patients // Cir. Esp. 2008. Vol. 83. P. 180–185.

16. Smithers B.M., Gotley D.C., Martin I., Thomas J.M. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy // Ann. Surg. 2007. Vol. 245. P. 232–240.


Review

For citations:


Volkova E.E., Vashakmadze L.A., Khomyakov V.M., Mamontov A.S. ACCELERATED HOSPITAL REHABILITATION OF PATIENTS AFTER EXTENDED-COMBINED SURGERIES FOR CANCER OF THORACIC ESOPHAGUS AND CARDIA. Siberian journal of oncology. 2013;(1):52-58. (In Russ.)

Views: 513


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1814-4861 (Print)
ISSN 2312-3168 (Online)