ACCELERATED HOSPITAL REHABILITATION OF PATIENTS AFTER EXTENDED-COMBINED SURGERIES FOR CANCER OF THORACIC ESOPHAGUS AND CARDIA
Abstract
About the Authors
E. E. VolkovaRussian Federation
L. A. Vashakmadze
Russian Federation
V. M. Khomyakov
Russian Federation
A. S. Mamontov
Russian Federation
References
1. Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland. Guidelines for implementation of enhanced recovery protocols. Issues in professional practice, 2009.
2. Cerfolio R.J., Bryant A.S., Bass C.S. et al. Fast tracking after Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy // Chest. 2004. Vol. 126. P. 1187–1194.
3. Griffin S.M., Shaw I.H., Dresner S.M. Early complications after Ivor Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy: risk factors and management // J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2002. Vol. 194. P. 285–297.
4. Hofstetter W., Swisher S.G., Correa A.M. et al. Treatment outcomes of resected esophageal cancer // Ann. Surg. 2002. Vol. 236. P. 376–384.
5. Karl R.C., Schreiber R., Boulware D. et al. Factors affecting morbidity, mortality, and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy // Ann. Surg. 2000. Vol. 231. P. 635–643.
6. Kehlet H., Willmore D.W. Multi-modal strategies to improve surgical outcome // Amer. J. Surg. 2002. Vol. 183. P. 600.
7. Kehlet H.,Wilmore D.W. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery // Ann. Surg. 2008. Vol. 248 (2). P. 189–198.
8. Kehlet H.,Wilmore D.W. Fast-track surgery // Br. J. Surg. 2005. Vol. 92. P. 3–4.
9. Ke Jiang, Lin Cheng, Jian-Jun Wang et al. Fast track clinical pathway implications in esophagogastrectomy // World J. Gastroenterol. 2009. Vol. 15 (4). P. 496–501.
10. Low D., Kunz S., Schembre D. et al. Esophagectomy – it’s not just about mortality anymore: standardized perioperative clinical pathways improve outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer // J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2007. Vol. 11 (11). P. 1395–1402.
11. Luketich J.D., Alvelo-Rivera M., Buenaventura P.O. et al. Minimallyinvasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients // Ann. Surg. 2003. Vol. 238. P. 486–494.
12. Meakins, J.L. Innovations in surgery: the rules of evidence // Am. J. Surg. 2002. Vol. 183. P. 399–405.
13. Munitiz V., Martinez-de-Haro L.F., Ortiz A. et al. Effectiveness of a written clinical pathway for enhanced recovery after transthoracic (Ivor Lewis) oesophagectomy // Br. J. Surg. 2010. Vol. 97. P. 714–718.
14. Nguyen N.T., Hinojosa M.W., Smith B.R. et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations // Ann. Surg. 2008. Vol. 248. P. 1081–1091.
15. Roig-Garcıa J., Girones-Vila J., Garsot-Savall E. et al. Transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy using minimally invasive techniques. Experience in 50 patients // Cir. Esp. 2008. Vol. 83. P. 180–185.
16. Smithers B.M., Gotley D.C., Martin I., Thomas J.M. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy // Ann. Surg. 2007. Vol. 245. P. 232–240.
Review
For citations:
Volkova E.E., Vashakmadze L.A., Khomyakov V.M., Mamontov A.S. ACCELERATED HOSPITAL REHABILITATION OF PATIENTS AFTER EXTENDED-COMBINED SURGERIES FOR CANCER OF THORACIC ESOPHAGUS AND CARDIA. Siberian journal of oncology. 2013;(1):52-58. (In Russ.)