Preview

Siberian journal of oncology

Advanced search

Revision of the significance of serological tumor-associated markers for lung adenocarcinoma taking into account HE-4

https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2025-24-5-53-63

Abstract

Human epididymis protein 4 (HE-4), traditionally used together with CA125 as a serum tumor-associated marker (TAM) of ovarian cancer, is now considered a promising diagnostic biomarker for lung cancer. the aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic characteristics of HE-4 and traditional OM in lung adenocarcinoma patients.

Material and Methods. The serum levels of HE-4, CEA, SCCA, Cyfra 21–1, ProGRP, CA125 and CA 15–3 were analyzed in the serum of 77 patients with morphologically confirmed lung adenocarcinoma and 34 patients with non-malignant lung diseases (NLD) using a CL-1200i automatic analyzer (Mindray, China). The reference values of the markers (upper limit of 95 % confidence interval in healthy donors) were provided by manufacturer. Age-dependent cutoffs were used for HE-4.

Results. In the general group of lung adenocarcinoma patients, the medians of HE-4, CEA, Cyfra 21–1, CA125, and CA15–3 levels significantly exceeded the corresponding values in the NLD group, but only for HE-4 the median did exceed the cutoff. The highest proportion of cases exceeding the cutoffs in the lung adenocarcinoma patients was observed for HE-4 (61.0 %), Cyfra 21–1 (41.6 %), and CEA (36.4 %). HE-4, CEA, Cyfra 21–1 and CA125 medians depended on the disease stage and increased with the raise of the local tumor spread and the extent of lymph node involvement. The incidence of elevated levels of at least one marker from the HE-4 + CEA pair in lung adenocarcinoma was 71.4 %, in the HE-4 + Cyfra 21-1 pair – 66.2 %, in the CEA and Cyfra 21–1 pair – 57.1 %, and in the HE-4 + CEA + Cyfra 21–1 combination – 75.3 % (at stage I – 50.0 %; at stage II – 72.7 %; at stage III – 88.5 %; at stage IV – 100 %). The majority of marker-negative cases, in which none of the studied TAMs was elevated, belonged to stage I of the disease (13/17, 76.5 %), three cases to stage II (17.6 %), one case to stage III; not a single marker-negative case was detected at stage IV.

Conclusion. HE-4 has the best diagnostic characteristics in the panel of seven studied TAMs. Assessment of the levels of three TAMs, namely HE-4, CEA and Cyfra 21–1, at the start of treatment in lung adenocarcinoma patients allows for the selection of markers for subsequent monitoring in most patients with stages II–IV and in approximately half of those with stage I.

About the Authors

N. S. Sergeeva
P.А. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Natalya S. Sergeeva - DSc, Professor, Head of the Department of Prediction of the Effectiveness of Conservative Treatment, Researcher ID (WOS): I-2033-2014. Author ID (Scopus): 7102748586.

3, 2nd Botkinsky Passage, Moscow, 125284



T. A. Karmakova
P.А. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Tatyana A. Karmakova - DSc, Leading Researcher, Department of Prediction of the Effectiveness of Conservative Treatment, Researcher ID (WOS): L-3592-2018. Author ID (Scopus): 6603382243.

3, 2nd Botkinsky Passage, Moscow, 125284



D. V. Shumanskaya
P.А. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

DariaV. Shumanskaya - MD, Oncologist, Thoracic Surgery Department, Junior Researcher, Myasthenia Group, Thoracoabdominal Surgery Department, Researcher ID (WOS): GOG-8510-2022.

3, 2nd Botkinsky Passage, Moscow, 125284



I. I. Alentov
P.А. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Igor I. Alentov - PhD, Senior Researcher, Department of Prediction of the Effectiveness of Conservative Treatment, Author ID (Scopus): 54683346300.

3, 2nd Botkinsky Passage, Moscow, 125284



N. V. Marshutina
P.А. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Nina V. Marshutina - PhD, Researcher, Department of Prediction of the Effectiveness of Conservative Treatment, Researcher ID (WOS): I-2027-2014. Author ID (Scopus): 6602904590.

3, 2nd Botkinsky Passage, Moscow, 125284



O. V. Pikin
P.А. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Oleg V. Pikin - MD, DSc, Professor, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Ministry of Health Russia; Head of the Department of Thoracic Surgery, P.А. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the NMRRC.

3, 2nd Botkinsky Passage, Moscow, 125284



A. D. Kaprin
P.А. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of Russia; National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of Russia; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation

Andrey D. Kaprin - MD, DSc, Professor, Academician of Russian Academy of Sciences, Corresponding Member of the RAS, Head of the Department of Oncology and Roentgenology named after Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences V.P. Kharchenko, Medical Institute, PFUR; Director, P.А. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the NMRRC; General Director, NMRCR. Researcher ID (WOS): K-1445-2014.

3, 2nd Botkinsky Passage, Moscow, 125284; Koroleva St., Obninsk, 249036, Russia 3; 6, Miklouho-Maklaya St., Moscow, 117198



References

1. Malignant tumors in Russia in 2023 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. by A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinsky, A.O. Shakhzadova. Moscow, 2024. 276 p. (in Russian). ISBN: 978-585502-298-8.

2. Cancer care for the population of Russia in 2023. Ed. by A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinsky, A.O. Shakhzadova. Moscow, 2024. 262 p. (in Russian). ISBN: 978-5-85502-297-1.

3. Malignant neoplasm of the bronchi and lung: clinical guidelines (approved by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation). 2021. (in Russian)]. [Internet]. [cited 17.09.2025]. URL: https://oncology-association.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/rak-legkogo-2021.pdf.

4. Muller M., Hoogendoorn R., Moritz R.J.G., van der Noort V., Lanfermeijer M., Korse C.M., van den Broek D., Ten Hoeve J.J., Baas P., van Rossum H.H., van den Heuvel M.M. Validation of a clinical bloodbased decision aid to guide immunotherapy treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Tumour Biol. 2021; 43(1): 115–27. doi: 10.3233/TUB-211504.

5. Chen Z., Liu X., Shang X., Qi K., Zhang S. The diagnostic value of the combination of carcinoembryonic antigen, squamous cell carcinoma-related antigen, CYFRA 21-1, neuron-specific enolase, tissue polypeptide antigen, and progastrin-releasing peptide in small cell lung cancer discrimination. Int J Biol Markers. 2021; 36(4): 36–44. doi: 10.1177/17246008211049446.

6. Braicu E.I., Krause C.L., Torsten U., Mecke H., Richter R., Hellmeyer L., Lanowska M., Müller B., Koch E., Boenneß-Zaloum J., Ames K., Chekerov R., Hasenbein K., Zimmermann M., Mangler M., Chen F., Tauber R., Sehouli J. HE4 as a serum biomarker for the diagnosis of pelvic masses: a prospective, multicenter study in 965 patients. BMC Cancer. 2022; 22(1): 831. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09887-5.

7. Du Q., Yan C., Wu S.G., Zhang W., Huang C., Yao Y., Wang L., Zhang Q., Liu Q., Guan J., Hou Y., Li Z., Soh A., Beshiri A., Wang Q., Li X., Zheng Y., Wang H. Development and validation of a novel diagnostic nomogram model based on tumor markers for assessing cancer risk of pulmonary lesions: A multicenter study in Chinese population. Cancer Lett. 2018; 420: 236–41. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.01.079.

8. Wang Y., Wang Z., Ding Y., Sun F., Ding X. The application value of serum HE4 in the diagnosis of lung cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019; 20(8): 2405–407. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.8.2405.

9. Guo L., Song B., Xiao J., Lin H., Chen J., Su X. The prognostic value of biomarkers on detecting non-small cell lung cancer in a Chinese elderly population. Int J Gen Med. 2021; 14: 5279–86. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S331311.

10. Li J., Li Y., Huo L., Sun R., Liu X., Gu Q., Li A., Han S., Liu H., Li Y., Zhang Y. Detection of serum HE4 levels contributes to the diagnosis of lung cancer. Oncol Lett. 2023; 25(6): 255. doi: 10.3892/ol.2023.13841.

11. Wu L., Chen X., Peng T., Tang E., Bai W., Chen L. Human epididymal protein 4 and its combined detection show good diagnostic value in lung cancer: A retrospective study. Int J Biol Markers. 2024; 39(2): 141–48. doi: 10.1177/03936155241244802.

12. Zhang T., Chu L., Tan W., Ye C., Dong H. Human epididymis protein 4, a novel potential biomarker for diagnostic and prognosis monitoring of lung cancer. Clin Respir J. 2024; 18(5): e13774. doi: 10.1111/crj.13774.

13. Dai C., Zheng Y., Li, Y., Tian T., Wang M., Xu P., Deng Y., Hao Q., Wu Y., Zhai Z., Dai Z., Lyu J. Prognostic values of HE4 expression in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer Manag Res. 2018; 10: 4491–500. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S178345.

14. Zare M.E., Nasir Kansestani A., Wu X., Zhou L., Lu J., Huang J., Wang Y., Ma Y., Gao Y., Zhang J. Serum human epididymis Protein-4 outperforms conventional biomarkers in the early detection of nonsmall cell lung cancer. iScience. 2024; 27(11): 111211. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111211.

15. la Salvia A., Fanciulli G. Progastrin-releasing peptide as a diagnostic biomarker of pulmonary and non-pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms. Endocr Res. 2024; 49(4): 243–50. doi: 10.1080/07435800.2024.2365895.

16. Bolstad N., Øijordsbakken M., Nustad K., Bjerner J. Human epididymis protein 4 reference limits and natural variation in a Nordic reference population. Tumour Biol. 2012; 33(1): 141–48. doi: 10.1007/s13277-011-0256-4.

17. Hertlein L., Stieber P., Kirschenhofer A., Krocker K., Nagel D., Lenhard M., Burges A. Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) in benign and malignant diseases. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012; 50(12): 2181–88. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0097.

18. He Y.P., Li L.X., Tang J.X., Yi L., Zhao Y., Zhang H.W., Wu Z.J., Lei H.K., Yu H.Q., Nian W.Q., Gan L. HE4 as a biomarker for diagnosis of lung cancer: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(39): e17198. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017198.

19. Choi S.I., Jang M.A., Jeon B.R., Shin H.B., Lee Y.K., Lee Y.W. Clinical usefulness of human epididymis protein 4 in lung cancer. Ann Lab Med. 2017; 37(6): 526–30. doi: 10.3343/alm.2017.37.6.526.

20. Kumbasar U., Dikimen Z.G., Yilmaz Y., Ancin B., Dikimen E., Dogan R. Serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) as a diagnostic and follow-up biomarker in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Hematol Oncol. 2017; 27(3): 137–42. doi: 10.4999/uhod.171830.

21. Li M., Zhang Y., Jiang L., Li Y., Li G., Zhou J., Yang C., Li X., Qu W., Chen Y., Chen Q., Wang S., Xing J., Huang H. New insights into the diagnostic characteristics and clinical application of serum biomarkers for lung cancer, and human epididymis protein 4 as a new biomarkes. Neoplasma. 2022; 69(3): 729–40. doi: 10.4149/neo_2022_220207N144.

22. Huang W., Wu S., Lin Z., Chen P., Wu G. Evaluation of HE4 in the diagnosis and follow up of non-small cell lung cancers. Clin Lab. 2017; 63(3): 461–67. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2016.160818.

23. Li M., Wang F., Wang X., Zhang C. Diagnostic value of human epididymis protein 4 in malignant pleural effusion in lung cancer. Cancer Biomark. 2019; 26(4): 523–28. doi: 10.3233/CBM-190840.

24. Mo D., He F. Serum Human Epididymis Secretory Protein 4 (HE4) is a Potential Prognostic Biomarker in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Lab. 2018; 64(9): 1421–28. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2018.180222.

25. Lamy P.J., Plassot C., Pujol J.L. Serum HE4: An independent prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer. PloS One. 2015; 10(6): e0128836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128836.

26. Liu W., Yang J., Chi P.D., Zheng X., Dai S.Q., Chen H., Xu B.L., Liu W.L. Evaluating the clinical significance of serum HE4 levels in lung cancer and pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013; 17(10): 1346–53. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.13.0058.

27. Muley T., He Y., Rolny V., Wehnl B., Escherich A., Warth A., Stolp C., Schneider M.A., Meister M., Herth F.J., Dayyani F. Potential for the bloodbased biomarkers cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) and human epididymal protein 4 (HE4) to detect recurrence during monitoring after surgical resection of adenocarcinoma of the lung. Lung Cancer. 2019; 130: 194–200. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.02.017.

28. de Kock R., Borne B.V.D., Soud M.Y., Belderbos H., Stege G., de Saegher M., van Dongen-Schrover C., Genet S., Brunsveld L., Scharnhorst V., Deiman B. Circulating biomarkers for monitoring therapy response and detection of disease progression in lung cancer patients. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2021; 28: 100410. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100410.

29. Zhong H., Qian Y., Fang S., Yang L., Li L., Gu W. HE4 expression in lung cancer, a meta-analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 2017; 470: 109–14. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2017.05.007.


Review

For citations:


Sergeeva N.S., Karmakova T.A., Shumanskaya D.V., Alentov I.I., Marshutina N.V., Pikin O.V., Kaprin A.D. Revision of the significance of serological tumor-associated markers for lung adenocarcinoma taking into account HE-4. Siberian journal of oncology. 2025;24(5):53-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2025-24-5-53-63

Views: 14


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1814-4861 (Print)
ISSN 2312-3168 (Online)