Preview

Siberian journal of oncology

Advanced search

In vivo study of the antitumor activity of indole-3-propionic acid and its combination with chemotherapy drugs

https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2026-25-1-54-61

Abstract

Background. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is characterized by high mortality and the development of therapy resistance. Indole-3-propionic acid (IPA), a gut microbiota-derived metabolite, shows promise in treating colorectal cancer (CRC) by strengthening antitumor immunity and improving chemotherapy effcacy.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the antitumor activity of indole-3-propionate in vivo using a mouse model of colorectal cancer.
Material and Methods. The experiment was conducted on 42 female mice with subcutaneous CT26 CRC. After reaching a tumor volume of 50–60 мм3 , the animals were randomized into 6 groups (n=7): control (0.9 % NaCl saline i.p. and p.o.), IPA monotherapy (6 mg/kg, p.o.), 5-fuorouracil (5-FU) (25 mg/kg, i.p.), oxaliplatin (OXA) (10 mg/kg, i.p.), combination IPA (6 mg/kg, p.o.) + 5-FU (25 mg/kg, i.p.) and IPA (6 mg/kg, p.o.) + OXA (10 mg/kg, i.p.). Drugs were administered 3 times per week (Mon, Wed, Fri) for 3 weeks. The results were assessed one week after the end of treatment. Tumor volume and tumor growth inhibition (TGI) percentage were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test.
Results. IPA monotherapy had no signifcant effect (TGI=5.0 %). Chemotherapeutic agents in monotherapy demonstrated moderate activity: TGI 22.9 % for 5-FU and 19.4 % for OXA. The greatest effcacy was achieved in the combination therapy groups: TGI 31.9 % for IPA + 5-FU and 30.1 % for IPA + OXA. Statistically signifcant growth inhibition in these groups was registered from day 18 (4 days earlier than with cytostatic monotherapy). Toxicity, assessed by body weight dynamics, was absent in all groups.
Discussion. The results obtained demonstrate that IPA does not possess independent cytotoxic activity against CT26 tumor cells. However, its potential in combination with standard chemotherapeutic drugs was revealed. Earlier and more pronounced TGI in the combination therapy groups indicates the ability of IPA to accelerate the development of a therapeutic response.
Conclusion. IPA potentiates the antitumor activity of 5-FU and OXA on the CT26 CRC model without increasing systemic toxicity. The obtained data justify further study of the mechanisms of IPA synergy with chemotherapeutic agents and its effcacy in other malignant neoplasms.

About the Authors

D. A. Lysenko
National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Daniel A. Lysenko, Postgraduate, Department of Abdominal Oncology No. 2 

63, 14-liniya St., Rostov-on-Don, 344037



V. E. Kolesnikov
National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Vladimir E. Kolesnikov, MD, DSc, Coloproctologist, Department of Abdominal Oncology No. 2 

63, 14-liniya St., Rostov-on-Don, 344037



A. V. Galina
National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Anastasia V. Galina, Junior Researcher, Testing Laboratory Center 

63, 14-liniya St., Rostov-on-Don, 344037



L. Yu. Vladimirova
National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Lyubov Yu. Vladimirova, MD, DSc, Professor, Head of the Department of Antitumor Drug Therapy 

63, 14-liniya St., Rostov-on-Don, 344037



A. N. Shevchenko
National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Alexey N. Shevchenko, MD, DSc, Professor, Head of the Urologic Oncology Department 

63, 14-liniya St., Rostov-on-Don, 344037



D. V. Khodakova
National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Daria V. Khodakova, Researcher, Testing Laboratory Center 

63, 14-liniya St., Rostov-on-Don, 344037



M. A. Kuznetsova
National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Marina A. Kuznetsova, MD, Pathologist 

63, 14-liniya St., Rostov-on-Don, 344037



A. A. Shulga
National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Anna A. Shulga, Junior Researcher, Testing Laboratory Center 

63, 14-liniya St., Rostov-on-Don, 344037



S. N. Vlasov
Rostov State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Sergey N. Vlasov, student, Faculty of Medicine and Prevention 

29, Nakhichevansky per., Rostov-on-Don, 344022



References

1. Khailova Zh.V., Kaprin A.D., Ivanov S.A., Komarov Yu.I., Shakhzadova A.O., Mikhailov I.A., Omelyanovsky V.V. Results of epidemiological monitoring of morbidity, mortality, prevalence of malignant neoplasms based on the current state cancer registry. Manager Zdravoochranenia. 2024; 11: 39–51. (in Russian). doi: 10.21045/1811-0185-2024-11-39-51. EDN: DFKZBO.

2. Kit O.I., Gevorkyan Yu.A., Soldatkina N.V., Timoshkina N.N., Kharagezov D.A., Kaymakchi D.O., Poluektov S.I., Dashkov A.V., Gudtskova T.N. Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. Coloproctology. 2021; 20(2): 42–49. (in Russian). doi: 10.33878/2073-7556-2021-20-2-42-49. EDN: OUYFXI.

3. Kalmykova E.O., Ishchenko R.V., Stukalova O.Yu., Filimonov D.A. Improvement of long-term treatment results in oligometastatic colorectal cancer patients by using a combined approach. South Russian Journal of Cancer. 2024; 5(4): 20–28. (in Russian). doi: 10.37748/2686-9039-2024-5-4-3. EDN: CCTLUM.

4. Maksimova P.E., Golubinskaya E.P., Seferov B.D., Zyablitska E.Yu. Colorectal cancer: epidemiology, carcinogenesis, molecular subtypes and cellular mechanisms of therapy resistance (analytical review). Coloproctology. 2023; 22(2): 160–71. (in Russian). doi: 10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-2-160-171. EDN TWZBRV.

5. Sári Z., Mikó E., Kovács T., Jankó L., Csonka T., Lente G., Sebő É., Tóth J., Tóth D., Árkosy P., Boratkó A., Ujlaki G., Török M., Kovács I., Szabó J., Kiss B., Méhes G., Goedert J.J., Bai P. Indolepropionic Acid, a Metabolite of the Microbiome, Has Cytostatic Properties in Breast Cancer by Activating AHR and PXR Receptors and Inducing Oxidative Stress. Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12(9): 2411. doi: 10.3390/cancers12092411.

6. Sehgal R., Ilha M., Vaittinen M., Kaminska D., Männistö V., Kärjä V., Tuomainen M., Hanhineva K., Romeo S., Pajukanta P., Pihlajamäki J., de Mello V.D. Indole-3-Propionic Acid, a Gut-Derived Tryptophan Metabolite, Associates with Hepatic Fibrosis. Nutrients. 2021; 13(10): 3509. doi: 10.3390/nu13103509.

7. Li W., Deng Y., Chu Q., Zhang P. Gut microbiome and cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Lett. 2019; 447: 41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.01.015.

8. Ou B., Zhao J., Guan S., Lu A. Survival of Colorectal Cancer in Patients With or Without Infammatory Bowel Disease: A Meta-Analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2016; 61(3): 881–89. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3940-1.

9. Jonker J.W., Liddle C., Downes M. FXR and PXR: potential therapeutic targets in cholestasis. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2012; 130(3-5): 147–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.06.012.

10. Sári Z., Mikó E., Kovács T., Jankó L., Csonka T., Lente G., Sebő É., Tóth J., Tóth D., Árkosy P., Boratkó A., Ujlaki G., Török M., Kovács I., Szabó J., Kiss B., Méhes G., Goedert J.J., Bai P. Indolepropionic Acid, a Metabolite of the Microbiome, Has Cytostatic Properties in Breast Cancer by Activating AHR and PXR Receptors and Inducing Oxidative Stress. Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12(9): 2411. doi: 10.3390/cancers12092411.

11. Zlatnik E.Yu., Sagakyants A.B., Novikova I.A., Maksimov A.Yu., Shatova O.P., Appolonova S.A., Moskaleva N.E., Rumyantsev S.A., Shestopalov A.V. Metabolism of tryptophan in non-small lung cancer patients with diferent efect of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors immunotherapy. Advances in Molecular Oncology 2022; 9(2): 89–96. (in Russian.). doi: 10.17650/2313-805X-2022-9-2-89-96. EDN: LKDLUM.

12. Lukbanova E.A., Zaikina E.V., Sayapin Yu.A., Gusakov E.A., Filippova S.Yu., Zlatnik E.Yu., Volkova A.V., Kurbanova L.Z., Khodakova D.V., Kaymakchi D.O., Lazutin Ju.N., Shevchenko A.N., Pandova O.V. Assessment of an antitumor efect of 2-(6,8-dimethyl-5-nitro-4chloroquinoline-2-yl)-5,6,7-trichloro-1,3-tropolone in A-549 tumor cell subcutaneous xenografts. Almanac of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 49(6): 396–404. (in Russian). doi: 10.18786/2072-0505-2021-49-021. EDN: ZVCWFZ.

13. European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and other Scientifc Purposes: [Strasbourg, 18 March 1986]. [ETS No. 123]. Council of Europe. (in Russian). [Internet]. [cited 11.03.2026]. URL: https://www.msu.ru/bioetika/doc/konv.doc.

14. Venkateswaran N., Garcia R., Lafta-Navarro M.C., Hao Y.H., Perez-Castro L., Nogueira P.A.S., Solmonson A., Mender I., Kilgore J.A., Fang S., Brown I.N, Li L., Parks E., Lopes Dos Santos I., Bhaskar M., Kim J., Jia Y., Lemoff A., Grishin N.V., Kinch L., Xu L., Williams N.S., Shay J.W., DeBerardinis R.J., Zhu H., Conacci-Sorrell M. Tryptophan fuels MYC-dependent liver tumorigenesis through indole 3-pyruvate synthesis. Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1): 4266. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47868-3.

15. Flannigan K.L., Nieves K.M., Szczepanski H.E., Serra A., Lee J.W., Alston L.A., Ramay H., Mani S., Hirota S.A. The Pregnane X Receptor and Indole-3-Propionic Acid Shape the Intestinal Mesenchyme to Restrain Infammation and Fibrosis. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023; 15(3): 765–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2022.10.014.

16. Owe-Larsson M., Drobek D., Iwaniak P., Kloc R., Urbanska E.M., Chwil M. Microbiota-Derived Tryptophan Metabolite Indole-3-Propionic Acid-Emerging Role in Neuroprotection. Molecules. 2025; 30(17): 3628. doi: 10.3390/molecules30173628.

17. Xiao H.W., Cui M., Li Y., Dong J.L., Zhang S.Q., Zhu C.C., Jiang M., Zhu T., Wang B., Wang H.C., Fan S.J. Gut microbiota-derived indole 3-propionic acid protects against radiation toxicity via retaining acyl-CoA-binding protein. Microbiome. 2020; 8(1): 69. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00845-6.

18. Kim C.S., Jung S., Hwang G.S., Shin D.M. Gut microbiota indole3-propionic acid mediates neuroprotective efect of probiotic consumption in healthy elderly: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial and in vitro study. Clin Nutr. 2023; 42(6): 1025–33. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2023.04.001.

19. Li J., Zhang L., Wu T., Li Y., Zhou X., Ruan Z. Indole-3-propionic Acid Improved the Intestinal Barrier by Enhancing Epithelial Barrier and Mucus Barrier. J Agric Food Chem. 2021; 69(5): 1487–95. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c05205.

20. Jia D., Kuang Z., Wang L. The role of microbial indole metabolites in tumor. Gut Microbes. 2024; 16(1): 2409209. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2024.2409209.

21. Pi Z., Liu W., Mao W. One size might ft all: Indole-3-propionic acid potentiates pan-cancer immunotherapy. Cell Host Microbe. 2024; 32(5): 627–30. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2024.03.011.


Review

For citations:


Lysenko D.A., Kolesnikov V.E., Galina A.V., Vladimirova L.Yu., Shevchenko A.N., Khodakova D.V., Kuznetsova M.A., Shulga A.A., Vlasov S.N. In vivo study of the antitumor activity of indole-3-propionic acid and its combination with chemotherapy drugs. Siberian journal of oncology. 2026;25(1):54-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2026-25-1-54-61

Views: 182

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1814-4861 (Print)
ISSN 2312-3168 (Online)