Preview

Siberian journal of oncology

Advanced search

Combination of temozolomide and oncolytic viral therapy potentiates apoptosis and inhibits cell migration of glioblastoma in vitro

https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2026-25-2-80-93

Abstract

Background. Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive and malignant type of glioma, representing the most common and lethal primary central nervous system (CNS) neoplasm in adults. Despite current therapeutic approaches, the median overall survival remains low. Oncolytic virotherapy is a highly promising alternative strategy. One such approach utilizes the Herpes Simplex Virus Thymidine Kinase (HSV-TK) enzyme combined with the prodrug ganciclovir (GCV). This TK-GCV system is converted into a toxic metabolite that induces apoptosis in target cells. Combining the TK-GCV system with temozolomide (TMZ), the standard first-line chemotherapeutic agent for glioma, targets two critical survival mechanisms of GBM: DNA repair and apoptosis regulation. This combination has the potential to significantly improve therapeutic efficacy.

Aim. We evaluated the impact of combined TK-GCV and TMZ therapy on glioblastoma cell viability and migratory capacity in vitro.

Material and Methods. This work employed the following cell lines: GBM cell lines U87-MG and U251-MG, HEK293T/17 cells, and human mesenchymal stem cells. Recombinant viral particles encoding the thymidine kinase (TK) gene were generated using genetic engineering techniques. Optimal concentrations of TMZ and GCV were determined. Cell viability was assessed using the MTT assay; cell cycle distribution (G2/M phase) and Bax expression were analyzed by flow cytometry; gene expression was quantified via quantitative PCR (qPCR); and cell migration was measured using a wound-healing assay.

Results. The combination of TMZ and the TK-GCV system results in a significant increase in GBM cell death compared to monotherapy. Specifically, this enhanced cell death is characterized by a higher proportion of apoptotic cells. Furthermore, expression levels of EMT markers such as CD44, ZEB1, SNAI1, SNAI2, and VIM were significantly reduced under the combined treatment of TK-GCV and TMZ.

Conclusion. The combination of TK-GCV and TMZ demonstrates a synergistic effect between the two therapeutic approaches. Compared to each method administered separately, the combined treatment results in increased GBM cell death and reduced cell migration.

About the Authors

A. O. Romanishin
Laboratory of Translational Research, institute of Medicine and life Sciences, I. Kant Baltic Federal University
Russian Federation

Alexander O. Romanishin - Engineer, Laboratory of Translational Research, Institute of Medicine and Life Sciences

Author ID (Scopus): 57216789798

2, Universitetskaya St., Kaliningrad, 236041



A. A. Vasilev
Laboratory of Translational Research, institute of Medicine and life Sciences, I. Kant Baltic Federal University
Russian Federation

Alexander A. Vasilev - PhD, Junior Researcher, Laboratory of Translational Research, Institute of Medicine and Life Sciences

Author ID (Scopus): 59117338100

2, Universitetskaya St., Kaliningrad, 236041



V. Yu. Sysoeva
Laboratory of Mechanisms of Morphogenesis and Tissue Repair, Medical Research and Education institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Veronika Yu. Sysoeva - PhD, Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Mechanisms of Morphogenesis and Tissue Repair, Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, Medical Research and Education Institute

ResearcherID (WOS): ABA-1184-2021

Author ID (Scopus): 6603150390

27, Bld. 1, Lomonosovsky Prospekt, Moscow, 119234



K. A. Rubina
Laboratory of Mechanisms of Morphogenesis and Tissue Repair, Medical Research and Education institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Ksenia A. Rubina - DSc, Professor of Russian Academy of Science, Head of Laboratory of Mechanisms of Morphogenesis and Tissue Repair, Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, Medical Research and Education Institute

ResearcherID (WOS): A-8208-2014

Author ID (Scopus): 7004199601

27, Bld. 1, Lomonosovsky Prospekt, Moscow, 119234



E. V. Semina
Laboratory of Translational Research, institute of Medicine and life Sciences, I. Kant Baltic Federal University; Laboratory of Mechanisms of Morphogenesis and Tissue Repair, Medical Research and Education institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Ekaterina V. Semina - DSc, Head of Laboratory of Translational Research, Institute of Medicine and Life Sciences, I. Kant BFU; Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Mechanisms of Morphogenesis and Tissue Repair, Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, Medical Research and Education Institute, Lomonosov MSU

ResearcherID (WOS): A-8184-2014

Author ID (Scopus): 35081127300

2, Universitetskaya St., Kaliningrad, 236041; 27, Bld. 1, Lomonosovsky Prospekt, Moscow, 119234



References

1. Stupp R., Mason W.P., van den Bent M.J., Weller M., Fisher B., Taphoorn M.J., Belanger K., Brandes A.A., Marosi C., Bogdahn U., Curschmann J., Janzer R.C., Ludwin S.K., Gorlia T., Allgeier A., Lacombe D., Cairncross J.G., Eisenhauer E., Mirimanoff R.O.; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor and Radiotherapy Groups; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005; 10; 352(10): 987–96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043330.

2. Botezatu I.V., Kondratova V.N., Stroganova A.M., Dranko S.L., Naskhletashvili D.R., Lichtenstein A.V. Methylation of MGMT promoter as a prognostic marker of glioblastoma. Advances in Molecular Oncology. 2025; 12(3): 70–77. (in Russian). doi: 10.17650/2313-805X-2025-12-3-70-77. EDN: MVJLUP.

3. Gulaia V., Shmelev M., Romanishin A., Shved N., Farniev V., Goncharov N., Biktimirov A., Vargas I.L., Khodosevich K., Kagansky A., Kumeiko V. Single-nucleus transcriptomics of IDH1and TP53-mutant glioma stem cells displays diversified commitment on invasive cancer progenitors. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1): 18975. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23646-3.

4. Antonica F., Santomaso L., Pernici D., Petrucci L., Aiello G., Cutarelli A., Conti L., Romanel A., Miele E., Tebaldi T., Tiberi L. A slowcycling/quiescent cells subpopulation is involved in glioma invasiveness. Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1): 4767. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32448-0.

5. Erices J.I., Bizama C., Niechi I., Uribe D., Rosales A., Fabres K., Navarro-Martínez G., Torres Á., San Martín R., Roa J.C., Quezada-Monrás C. Glioblastoma Microenvironment and Invasiveness: New Insights and Therapeutic Targets. Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(8): 7047. doi: 10.3390/ijms24087047.

6. Adjei-Sowah E.A., O’Connor S.A., Veldhuizen J., Lo Cascio C., Plaisier C., Mehta S., Nikkhah M. Investigating the Interactions of Glioma Stem Cells in the Perivascular Niche at Single-Cell Resolution using a Microfluidic Tumor Microenvironment Model. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2022; 9(21): e2201436. doi: 10.1002/advs.202201436.

7. Putavet D.A., de Keizer P.L.J. Residual Disease in Glioma Recurrence: A Dangerous Liaison with Senescence. Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(7): 1560. doi: 10.3390/cancers13071560.

8. Masud N., Hasib M.H.H., Ibironke B., Block C., Hughes J., Ekpenyong A., Sarkar A. Exploring the heterogeneity in glioblastoma cellular mechanics using in-vitro assays and atomic force microscopy. Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1): 19302. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04841-4.

9. Zhao W., Xie Q. Exosomal lncRNA-Mediated Intercellular Communication Promotes Glioblastoma Chemoresistance. Cancer Immunol Res. 2021; 9(12): 1372. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-21-0846.

10. Ellert-Miklaszewska A., Poleszak K., Pasierbinska M., Kaminska B. Integrin Signaling in Glioma Pathogenesis: From Biology to Therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(3): 888. doi: 10.3390/ijms21030888.

11. Wang Z., Mo Y., Tan Y., Wen Z., Dai Z., Zhang H., Zhang X., Feng S., Liang X., Song T., Cheng Q. The ALDH Family Contributes to Immunocyte Infiltration, Proliferation and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transformation in Glioma. Front Immunol. 2022; 12:756606. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.756606.

12. Malhotra J., Kim E.S. Oncolytic Viruses and Cancer Immunotherapy. Curr Oncol Rep. 2023; 25(1): 19–28. doi: 10.1007/s11912-022-01341-w.

13. Yang R., Hedberg J., Montagano J., Seals M., Puri S. Oncolytic Virus Therapies in Malignant Gliomas: Advances and Clinical Trials. Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(19): 3180. doi: 10.3390/cancers17193180.

14. Faisal S.M., Castro M.G., Lowenstein P.R. Combined cytotoxic and immune-stimulatory gene therapy using Ad-TK and Ad-Flt3L: Translational developments from rodents to glioma patients. Mol Ther. 2023; 31(10): 2839–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2023.08.009.

15. Romanishin A., Vasilev A., Khasanshin E., Evtekhov A., Pusynin E., Rubina K., Kakotkin V., Agapov M., Semina E. Oncolytic viral therapy for gliomas: Advances in the mechanisms and approaches to delivery. Virology. 2024; 593: 110033. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2024.110033.

16. Oishi T., Ito M., Koizumi S., Horikawa M., Yamamoto T., Yamagishi S., Yamasaki T., Sameshima T., Suzuki T., Sugimura H., Namba H., Kurozumi K. Efficacy of HSV-TK/GCV system suicide gene therapy using SHED expressing modified HSV-TK against lung cancer brain metastases. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2022; 26: 253–65. doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2022.07.001.

17. Luo E.W., Liao M.L., Chien C.L. Neural differentiation of glioblastoma cell lines via a herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase/ganciclovir system driven by a glial fibrillary acidic protein promoter. PLoS One. 2021; 16(8): e0253008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253008.

18. Erickson N.J., Stavarache M., Tekedereli I., Kaplitt M.G., Markert J.M. Herpes Simplex Oncolytic Viral Therapy for Malignant Glioma and Mechanisms of Delivery. World Neurosurg. 2025; 194: 123595. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123595.

19. Liskovykh M., Chuykin I., Ranjan A., Safina D., Popova E., Tolkunova E., Mosienko V., Minina J.M., Zhdanova N.S., Mullins J.J., Bader M., Alenina N., Tomilin A. Derivation, characterization, and stable transfection of induced pluripotent stem cells from Fischer344 rats. PLoS One. 2011; 6(11): e27345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027345.

20. Coleman J.E., Huentelman M.J., Kasparov S., Metcalfe B.L., Paton J.F., Katovich M.J., Semple-Rowland S.L., Raizada M.K. Efficient large-scale production and concentration of HIV-1-based lentiviral vectors for use in vivo. Physiol Genomics. 2003; 12(3): 221–28. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00135.2002.

21. Koessinger A.L., Cloix C., Koessinger D., Heiland D.H., Bock F.J., Strathdee K., Kinch K., Martínez-Escardó L., Paul N.R., Nixon C., Malviya G., Jackson M.R., Campbell K.J., Stevenson K., Davis S,. Elmasry Y., Ahmed A., O’Prey J., Ichim G., Schnell O., Stewart W., Blyth K., Ryan K.M., Chalmers A.J., Norman J.C., Tait S.W.G. Increased apoptotic sensitivity of glioblastoma enables therapeutic targeting by BH3-mimetics. Cell Death Differ. 2022; 29(10): 2089–104. doi: 10.1038/s41418-022-01001-3.

22. Foucquier J., Guedj M. Analysis of drug combinations: current methodological landscape. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2015; 3(3): e00149. doi: 10.1002/prp2.149.

23. Madhavan K., Balakrishnan I., Lakshmanachetty S., Pierce A., Sanford B., Fosmire S., Elajaili H.B., Walker F., Wang D., Nozik E.S., Mitra S.S., Dahl N.A., Vibhakar R., Venkataraman S. Venetoclax Cooperates with Ionizing Radiation to Attenuate Diffuse Midline Glioma Tumor Growth. Clin Cancer Res. 2022; 28(11): 2409–24. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-4002.

24. Rainov N.G., Fels C., Droege J.W., Schäfer C., Kramm C.M., Chou T.C. Temozolomide enhances herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase/ganciclovir therapy of malignant glioma. Cancer Gene Therapy. 2001; 8(9): 662–68.

25. Poon M.T.C., Bruce M., Simpson J.E., Hannan C.J., Brennan P.M. Temozolomide sensitivity of malignant glioma cell lines – a systematic review assessing consistencies between in vitro studies. BMC Cancer. 2021; 21(1): 1240. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08972-5.

26. Jezierzański M., Nafalska N., Stopyra M., Furgoł T., Miciak M., Kabut J., Gisterek-Grocholska I. Temozolomide (TMZ) in the Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme-A Literature Review and Clinical Outcomes. Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(7): 3994–4002. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31070296.

27. Chen Q., Wang W., Chen S., Chen X., Lin Y. miR-29a sensitizes the response of glioma cells to temozolomide by modulating the P53/ MDM2 feedback loop. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2021; 26(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s11658-021-00266-9.

28. Voce D.J., Bernal G.M., Wu L., Crawley C.D., Zhang W., Mansour N.M., Cahill K.E., Szymura S.J., Uppal A., Raleigh D.R., Spretz R., Nunez L., Larsen G., Khodarev N.N., Weichselbaum R.R., Yamini B. Temozolomide Treatment Induces lncRNA MALAT1 in an NF-κB and p53 Codependent Manner in Glioblastoma. Cancer Res. 2019; 79(10): 2536–48. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-2170.

29. Lanskikh D., Kuziakova O., Baklanov I., Penkova A., Doroshenko V., Buriak I., Zhmenia V., Kumeiko V. Cell-Based Glioma Models for Anticancer Drug Screening: From Conventional Adherent Cell Cultures to Tumor-Specific Three-Dimensional Constructs. Cells. 2024; 13(24): 2085. doi: 10.3390/cells13242085.

30. Alomari O., Eyvazova H., Güney B., Al Juhmani R., Odabasi H., Al-Rawabdeh L., Mokresh M.E., Erginoglu U., Keles A., Baskaya M.K. Oncolytic Therapies for Glioblastoma: Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(15): 2550. doi: 10.3390/cancers17152550.

31. Ageenko A., Vasileva N., Richter V., Kuligina E. Combination of Oncolytic Virotherapy with Different Antitumor Approaches against Glioblastoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(4): 2042. doi: 10.3390/ijms25042042.

32. Fan J., Jiang H., Cheng L., Ma B., Liu R. Oncolytic herpes simplex virus and temozolomide synergistically inhibit breast cancer cell tumorigenesis in vitro and in vivo. Oncol Lett. 2021; 21(2): 99. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.12360.

33. D’arrigo P., Dubois M., Sanchez Gil J., Lassence C., Hego A., Brouwers B., Lombard A., Rogister B., Neirinckx V., Lebrun M., SadzotDelvaux C. An oncolytic herpesvirus expressing a CXCR4 antagonist interferes with glioblastoma cells’ stemness features and migration. Mol Ther Oncol. 2025; 33(4): 201083. doi: 10.1016/j.omton.2025.201083.

34. Kim S., Jung B.K., Kim J., Jeon J.H., Kim M., Jang S.H., Kim C.S., Jang H. Anticancer effect of the oncolytic Newcastle disease virus harboring the PTEN gene on glioblastoma. Oncol Lett. 2024; 29(1): 6. doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14752.


Supplementary files

1. Supplementary 1
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
Download (1MB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
2. Supplementary 2
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
Download (935KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
3. Supplementary 3
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
Download (1MB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
4. Supplementary 4
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
Download (1MB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
5. Fig. 1. A. TK cloning design into pTYF.EF1a-DLDH-hIRES-eGFP. B. Chromatographic sequence of TK starting at 3’-end. Note: created by the authors
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (485KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
6. Fig. 2. Confirmation of pTK expression after transduction of GBM and MSC cells with lentivirus encoding TK. A. Microphotographic images of cell lines, transduced with pTK lentivirus, which express GFP (magnification – ×10, scale bar – 250 μm). B. Analysis of relative pTK expression in GBM and MSC cells. NC – negative controls (wild type cells); pTK – cells transduced with pTK (n=6; **** – p<0,001). Note: created by the authors
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (350KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
7. Fig. 3. Cell viability under different conditions. NC – negative control (wild type cells), TK – pTK transduced cells, GCV – wild type cells under GCV treatment, TMZ – wild type cells under TMZ treatment, TK + TMZ – pTK transduced cells under TMZ treatment, GCV + TMZ – wild type cells under combined GCV and TMZ treatment, TK-GCV – pTK transduced cells under GCV treatment, TK-GCV + TMZ – pTK transduced cells under combined GCV and TMZ treatment. One-way ANOVA (Bonferroni correction) (* – p<0,05; ** – p<0,01; *** – p<0,005; **** – p<0,001; n=8). Note: created by the authors
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (124KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
8. Fig. 4. Analysis of Bax+ cells amount under different conditions. NC – negative control (wild type cells); TMZ – wild type cells under TMZ treatment; TK-GCV – pTK transduced cells under GCV treatment; TK-GCV + TMZ – pTK transduced cells, under combined TK and TMZ treatment. One-way ANOVA with Tukey correction (* – p<0,05; ** – p<0,01; *** – p<0,005; **** – p<0,001; n=3). Note: created by the authors
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (141KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
9. Fig. 5. Analysis of G2/M inhibition of cells under different conditions. NC – negative control(wild type cells); TMZ – wild type cells under TMZ treatment; TK-GCV – pTK transduced cells under GCV treatment; TK-GCV + TMZ – pTK transduced cells, under combined TK and TMZ treatment. One-way ANOVA with Tukey correction (* – p<0.05; ** – p<0.01; *** – p<0.005; n=4). Note: created by the authors
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (130KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
10. Fig. 6. Analysis of relative expression of EMT and stemness-associated genes relative expression. NC – negative control (wild type cells); TMZ – wild type cells under TMZ treatment; TK-GCV – pTK transduced cells under GCV treatment; TK-GCV + TMZ – pTK transduced cells, under combined TK and TMZ treatment. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett correction (* – p<0.05; ** – p<0.01; *** – p<0.005, **** – p<0.001; n=6). Note: created by the authors
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (302KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
11. Fig. 7. Cell migration analysis of U87 cells under different conditions. A. Microphotographic images of U87 with highlighted wound edge (magnification – ×4, scale bar – 800 μm). B. U87 cell migration statistical analysis. NC – negative control (wild type cells); TMZ – wild type cells under TMZ treatment; TK-GCV – pTK transduced cells under GCV treatment; TK-GCV + TMZ – pTK transduced cells, under combined TK and TMZ treatment. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett correction (**** – p<0.001; n=6). Note: created by the authors
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (362KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
12. Fig. 8. Cell migration analysis of U251 cells under different conditions. A. Microphotographic images of U251 with highlighted wound edge (magnification – 4x, scale bar – 800 μm). B. U251 cell migration statistical analysis. NC – negative control (wild type cells); TMZ – wild type cells under TMZ treatment; TK-GCV – pTK transduced cells under GCV treatment; TK-GCV + TMZ – pTK transduced cells, under combined TK and TMZ treatment. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett correction (** – p<0.01, n=6). Note: created by the authors
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (344KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾

Review

For citations:


Romanishin A.O., Vasilev A.A., Sysoeva V.Yu., Rubina K.A., Semina E.V. Combination of temozolomide and oncolytic viral therapy potentiates apoptosis and inhibits cell migration of glioblastoma in vitro. Siberian journal of oncology. 2026;25(2):80-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2026-25-2-80-93

Views: 385

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1814-4861 (Print)
ISSN 2312-3168 (Online)