Preview

Siberian journal of oncology

Advanced search

Current concepts of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: a literature review

https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2025-24-4-112-121

Abstract

Objective: to systematically analyze the data available in the modern literature on sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer in various clinical situations. 
Material and Methods. The search was conducted in the Web of science, PubMed, scopus, Google scholar databases. A total of 213 sources devoted to sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer were analyzed, of which 48 were included in the review. 
Results. Sentinel lymph node biopsy has been established as a standard procedure in early stages of breast cancer, demonstrating efficacy and safety in small tumors, intact lymph nodes and micrometastases. Currently, there is a clear trend toward expanding sentinel lymph node biopsy indications into more complex cases, including changes in lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, multicentric cancer, and recurrent breast cancer. Studies are underway to evaluate the safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy during pregnancy, opening up new perspectives for the treatment of this vulnerable group of patients. Expanding the indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy will help avoid radical lymphadenectomy and its associated complications, such as postmastectomy syndrome. this, in turn, will significantly improve the quality of life of cancer patients by reducing postoperative morbidity and accelerating rehabilitation. 
Conclusion. Further study and implementation of expanded indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy is a promising direction in modern oncology aimed at optimizing treatment and maintaining the quality of life of patients.

About the Authors

A. K. Kostrygin
Ivanovo State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia ; Ivanovo Regional Oncology Dispensary
Russian Federation

Aleksandr K. Kostrygin, MD, PhD, Head of the Department of Oncology and Radiation Therapy; Chief Physician 

Author ID (Scopus): 56152200900 

8, Sheremetevsky ave., Ivanovo, 153000 

5, Lyubimova st., Ivanovo, 153051 



K. A. Blinova
Ivanovo State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia ; Ivanovo Regional Oncology Dispensary
Russian Federation

Ksenia A. Blinova, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Oncology and Radiation Therapy; Physician 

8, Sheremetevsky ave., Ivanovo, 153000 

5, Lyubimova st., Ivanovo, 153051 

Author ID (Scopus): 59415662400 



V. V. Alekseev
Ivanovo State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia ; Ivanovo Regional Oncology Dispensary
Russian Federation

Valentin V. Alekseev, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Oncology and Radiation Therapy; Deputy Chief Physician for Medical Affairs 

8, Sheremetevsky ave., Ivanovo, 153000 

5, Lyubimova st., Ivanovo, 153051 



D. E. Frolova
Ivanovo State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia ; Ivanovo Regional Oncology Dispensary
Russian Federation

Darya E. Frolova, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Oncology and Radiation Therapy; Physician

8, Sheremetevsky ave., Ivanovo, 153000  

5, Lyubimova st., Ivanovo, 153051  



V. A. Suvorov
Ivanovo State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia ; Ivanovo Regional Oncology Dispensary
Russian Federation

Vladimir A. Suvorov, MD, PhD, Assistant, Department of Oncology and Radiation Therapy; Physician 

Researcher ID (WOS): HJY-4463-2023. Author ID (Scopus): 57220123738 

8, Sheremetevsky ave., Ivanovo, 153000 

5, Lyubimova st., Ivanovo, 153051 



M. A. Zolkina
Ivanovo State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia ; Ivanovo Regional Oncology Dispensary
Russian Federation

Maria A. Zolkina, Assistant, Department of Oncology and Radiation Therapy; Physician 

8, Sheremetevsky ave., Ivanovo, 153000 

5, Lyubimova st., Ivanovo, 153051 



D. V. Gutova
Ivanovo State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Daria V. Gutova, Student 

8, Sheremetevsky ave., Ivanovo, 153000 



K. A. Ionov
Ivanovo State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Kirill A. Ionov, Student 

8, Sheremetevsky ave., Ivanovo, 153000 



V. V. Antropova
Ivanovo State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Vladislava V. Antropova, Resident 

8, Sheremetevsky ave., Ivanovo, 153000 



I. E. Mishina
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Irina E. Mishina, MD, DSc, Professor, Department of Postgraduate Medical Education, First Deputy Director, Medical Institute 

Researcher ID (WOS): F-3262-2019. Author ID (Scopus): 36958772100 

7–9, Universitetskaya nab., Saint Petersburg, 199034 



References

1. Malignant tumors in Russia in 2023 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. by A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinsky, A.O. Shakhzadova. Moscow, 2024. 276 p. (in Russian). ISBN: 978-5-85502-298-8.

2. Li J., Zhou Z., Dong J., Fu Y., Li Y., Luan Z., Peng X. Predicting breast cancer 5-year survival using machine learning: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2021; 16(4): e0250370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250370.

3. Zhao S., Li Y., Ning N., Liang H., Wu Y., Wu Q., Wang Z., Tian J., Yang J., Gao X., Liu A., Song Q., Zhang L. Association of peritumoral region features assessed on breast MRI and prognosis of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2024; 34(9): 6108–20. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10612-y.

4. Zhang Y., Yu D., Yang Q., Li W. Diagnostic efficacy of physical examination, preoperative ultrasound, and/or computed tomography in detecting lymph node metastasis: A single-center retrospective analysis of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2022; 134(3): 386–96. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2022.05.002.

5. Morawitz J., Bruckmann N.M., Dietzel F., Ullrich T., Bittner A.K., Hoffmann O., Mohrmann S., Haeberle L., Ingenwerth M., Umutlu L., Fendler W.P., Fehm T., Herrmann K., Antoch G., Sawicki L.M., Kirchner J. Determining the axillary nodal status with four current imaging modalities including 18F-FDG PET/MRI in newly diagnosed breast cancer: A comparative study using histopathology as reference standard. J Nucl Med. 2021; 62(12): 1677–83. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262009.

6. Cardoso J.H.C.O., de Lara I.C.A., Sobreira L.E.R., Lôbo A.O.M., Silvério I.I.L., Souza M.E.C., de Moraes F.C.A., Magalhães M.C.F. Omitting axillary lymph node dissection is associated with an increased risk of regional recurrence in early stage breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Clin Breast Cancer. 2024; 24(8): e665–80. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.07.011.

7. Ahmad S.Z., Vijaykumar D.K. Sentinel Lymph Node in Early Breast Cancer: Evidence, Techniques, and Controversies. Springer, Singapore; 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-6171-9_7. (Kunheri, B., Vijaykumar, D.K. (eds) Management of Early Stage Breast Cancer).

8. Li P., Zhang X., Fang Q., Du W. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cT1-2N0 minor salivary gland cancer in oral cavity. BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1): 1349. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13107-7.

9. Allard-Coutu A., Dobson V., Schmitz E., Shah H., Nessim C. The Evolution of the Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma. Life (Basel). 2023; 13(2): 489. doi: 10.3390/life13020489.

10. Fallara G., Pozzi E., Onur Cakir O., Tandogdu Z., Castiglione F., Salonia A., Alnajjar H.M., Muneer A.; EAU-YAU Penile and Testis Cancer Working Group. Diagnostic Accuracy of Dynamic Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2023; 9(3): 500–512. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.11.018.

11. Kubikova E., Badidova J., Klein M., Beder I. Jr., Benus R., Polak S., Varga I. Sentinel lymph node - historical background and current views on its significance in complex management of breast cancer patients. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2019; 120(6): 410–16. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2019_066.

12. Jatoi I., Kunkler I.H. Omission of sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer: Historical context and future perspectives on a modern controversy. Cancer. 2021; 127(23): 4376–83. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33960.

13. Kaushik M. Evolution of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer. New Delhi: Springer India; 2023. 131 p. (Chintamani V.M. Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer). ISBN: 978-81- 322-3992-5; 978-81-322-3994-9 (eBook).

14. Giammarile F., Vidal-Sicart S., Paez D., Pellet O., Enrique E.L., Mikhail-Lette M., Morozova O., Maria Camila N.M., Diana Ivonne R.S., Delgado Bolton R.C., Valdés Olmos R.A., Mariani G. Sentinel Lymph Node Methods in Breast Cancer. Semin Nucl Med. 2022; 52(5): 551–60. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2022.01.006.

15. Iancu G., Mustata L.M., Cigaran R., Gica N., Botezatu R., Median D., Panaitescu A.M., Peltecu G. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer. Principle, Difficulties and Pitfalls. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2021; 116(5): 533–41. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.116.5.533.

16. Hara Y., Otsubo R., Shinohara S., Morita M., Kuba S., Matsumoto M., Yamanouchi K., Yano H., Eguchi S., Nagayasu T. Lymphedema After Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer: Prevalence and Risk Factors-A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Lymphat Res Biol. 2022; 20(6): 600–606. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2021.0033.

17. Petousis S., Christidis P., Margioula-Siarkou C., Liberis A., Vavoulidis E., Margioula-Siarkou G., Vatopoulou A., Papanikolaou A., Mavromatidis G., Dinas K. Axillary lymph node dissection vs. sentinel node biopsy for early-stage clinically node-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022; 306(4): 1221–34. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06458-8.

18. Wanis K.N., Goetz L., So A., Glencer A.C., Sun S.X., Teshome M., Resetkova E., Hwang R.F., Hunt K.K., Candelaria R.P., Huo L., Singh P. The Prevalence of Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity and Implications for the Utility of Frozen Section Diagnosis Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Patients with Clinically Node-Negative HER2-Positive or Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(11): 7339–46. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15712-z.

19. Vázquez J.C., Piñero A., de Castro F.J., Lluch A., Martín M., Barnadas A., Alba E., Rodríguez-Lescure Á., Rojo F., Giménez J., Solá I., Quintana M.J., Bonfill X., Urrutia G., Sánchez-Rovira P. The value of sentinel lymph-node biopsy in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis and node-negative tumour after neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review. Clin Transl Oncol. 2023; 25(2): 417–28. doi: 10.1007/s12094-022-02953-1.

20. Giammarile F., Vidal-Sicart S., Paez D., Pellet O., Enrique E.L., Mikhail-Lette M., Morozova O., Maria Camila N.M., Diana Ivonne R.S., Delgado Bolton R.C., Valdés Olmos R.A., Mariani G. Sentinel Lymph Node Methods in Breast Cancer. Semin Nucl Med. 2022; 52(5): 551–60. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2022.01.006.

21. Zheng Q., Luo H., Xia W., Lu Q., Jiang K., Hong R., Xu F., Wang S. Long-term survival after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection in pN0 breast cancer patients: a population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022; 196(3): 613–22. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06746-6.

22. Gentilini O.D., Botteri E., Sangalli C., Galimberti V., Porpiglia M., Agresti R., Luini A., Viale G., Cassano E., Peradze N., Toesca A., Massari G., Sacchini V., Munzone E., Leonardi M.C., Cattadori F., Di Micco R., Esposito E., Sgarella A., Cattaneo S., Busani M., Dessena M., Bianchi A., Cretella E., Ripoll Orts F., Mueller M., Tinterri C., Chahuan Manzur B.J., Benedetto C., Veronesi P. SOUND Trial Group. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy vs No Axillary Surgery in Patients With Small Breast Cancer and Negative Results on Ultrasonography of Axillary Lymph Nodes: The SOUND Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2023; 9(11): 1557–64. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.3759.

23. Reimer T., Stachs A., Veselinovic K., Polata S., Müller T., Kühn T., Heil J., Ataseven B., Reitsamer R., Hildebrandt G., Knauer M., Golatta M., Stefek A., Zahm D.M., Thill M., Nekljudova V., Krug D., Loibl S., Gerber B. INSEMA investigators. Patient-reported outcomes for the Intergroup Sentinel Mamma study (INSEMA): A randomised trial with persistent impact of axillary surgery on arm and breast symptoms in patients with early breast cancer. EClinicalMedicine. 2022; 55: 101756. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101756.

24. Che Bakri N.A., Kwasnicki R.M., Khan N., Ghandour O., Lee A., Grant Y., Dawidziuk A., Darzi A., Ashrafian H., Leff D.R. Impact of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy on Upper Limb Morbidity in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Surg. 2023; 277(4): 572–80. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005671.

25. Breast cancer: clinical recommendations of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. 2021. (in Russian)] [Internet]. [cited 10.05.2025]. URL: https://oncology-association.ru/wpcontent/uploads/2021/02/rak-molochnoj-zhelezy-2021.pdf.

26. Bessa J.F., Novita G.G., Testa L., Freitas-Junior R., Marta G.N. Is my patient an appropriate candidate for sentinel node biopsy? Less axillary surgery, for the right patients. Critical review and grades of recommendation. Surg Oncol. 2024; 54: 102064. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102064.

27. Teichgraeber D.C., Guirguis M.S., Whitman G.J. Breast Cancer Staging: Updates in the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th Edition, and Current Challenges for Radiologists, From the AJR Special Series on Cancer Staging. Am J Roentgenol. 2021; 217(2): 278–90. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.25223.

28. Sousa N., Peleteiro B., Fougo J.L. Omission of axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients with micrometastasis or isolated tumor cells in sentinel lymph nodes: a 12-year experience in a tertiary breast unit. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023; 150(1): 1. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05513-4.

29. Wang G., Zhang S., Wang M., Liu L., Liu Y., Tang L., Bai H., Zhao H. Prognostic significance of occult lymph node metastases in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2021; 21(1): 875. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08582-1.

30. Petousis S., Christidis P., Margioula-Siarkou C., Liberis A., Vavoulidis E., Margioula-Siarkou G., Vatopoulou A., Papanikolaou A., Mavromatidis G., Dinas K. Axillary lymph node dissection vs. sentinel node biopsy for early-stage clinically node-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022; 306(4): 1221–34. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06458-8.

31. Min J.W., Cho J. Minimal Invasive and Individualizing Management of the Axillary Nodes. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021; 1187: 591–99. doi: 10.1007/978-981-32-9620-6_31.

32. Jatoi I., Kunkler I.H. Omission of sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer: Historical context and future perspectives on a modern controversy. Cancer. 2021; 127(23): 4376–83. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33960.

33. de Boniface J., Filtenborg Tvedskov T., Rydén L., Szulkin R., Reimer T., Kühn T., Kontos M., Gentilini O.D., Olofsson Bagge R., Sund M., Lundstedt D., Appelgren M., Ahlgren J., Norenstedt S., Celebioglu F., Sackey H., Scheel Andersen I., Hoyer U., Nyman P.F., Vikhe Patil E., Wieslander E., Dahl Nissen H., Alkner S., Andersson Y., Offersen B.V., Bergkvist L., Frisell J., Christiansen P.; SENOMAC Trialists’ Group. SENOMAC Trialists’ Group. Omitting Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer with Sentinel-Node Metastases. N Engl J Med. 2024; 390(13): 1163–75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2313487.

34. Fan Y.J., Li J.C., Zhu D.M., Zhu H.L., Zhao Y., Zhu X.B., Wu G., Bai T.T. Efficacy and safety comparison between axillary lymph node dissection with no axillary surgery in patients with sentinel node-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Surg. 2023; 23(1): 209. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02101-8.

35. Reyna C., Johnston M.E., Morris M.C., Lee T.C., Hanseman D., Shaughnessy E.A., Lewis J.D. National trends for axillary lymph node dissection and survival outcomes for clinical T3/T4 node-negative breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy with positive lymph nodes. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021; 189(1): 155–66. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06290-9.

36. Conforti F., Pala L., Sala I., Oriecuia C., De Pas T., Specchia C., Graffeo R., Pagan E., Queirolo P., Pennacchioli E., Colleoni M., Viale G., Bagnardi V., Gelber R.D. Evaluation of pathological complete response as surrogate endpoint in neoadjuvant randomised clinical trials of early stage breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2021; 375: e066381. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066381.

37. Choudhary P., Gogia A., Deo S., Sharma D., Mathur S.R., Batra A., Raju S., Hari K. Correlation of pathological complete response with outcomes in locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: An ambispective study. Cancer Research, Statistics, and Treatment. 2021; 4(4): 611–20. doi: 10.4103/crst.crst_197_21.

38. Cavalcante F.P., Millen E.C., Novita G.G., Zerwes F.P., Mattar A., Machado R.H.S., Frasson A.L. Sentinel lymph node biopsy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: an evidence-based review and recommendations for current practice. Chin Clin Oncol. 2023; 12(1): 6. doi: 10.21037/cco-22-110.

39. Lim S.Z., Yoo T.K., Lee S.B., Kim J., Chung I.Y., Ko B.S., Lee J.W., Son B.H., Ahn S.H., Kim S., Kim H.J. Long-term outcome in patients with nodal-positive breast cancer treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy alone after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024; 203(1): 95–102. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07104-w.

40. Damin A.P., Zancan M., Melo M.P., Biazus J.V. Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: guiding a more selective axillary approach. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021; 186(2): 527–34. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-06011-8.

41. Ferrarazzo G., Nieri A., Firpo E., Rattaro A., Mignone A., Guasone F., Manzara A., Perniciaro G., Spinaci S. The Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients Who Become Clinically Node-Negative Following Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Literature Review. Curr Oncol. 2023; 30(10): 8703–19. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30100630.

42. Tinterri C., Sagona A., Barbieri E., Di Maria Grimaldi S., Caraceni G., Ambrogi G., Jacobs F., Biondi E., Scardina L., Gentile D. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing NeoAdjuvant Chemotherapy: Clinical Experience with Node-Negative and Node-Positive Disease Prior to Systemic Therapy. Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(6): 1719. doi: 10.3390/cancers15061719.

43. Cao S., Liu X., Cui J., Liu X., Zhong J., Yang Z., Sun D., Wei W. Feasibility and reliability of sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with positive axillary nodes at initial diagnosis: An up-to-date meta-analysis of 3,578 patients. Breast. 2021; 59: 256–69. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.07.015.

44. Iancu G., Mustata L.M., Cigaran R., Gica N., Botezatu R., Median D., Panaitescu A.M., Peltecu G. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer. Principle, Difficulties and Pitfalls. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2021; 116(5): 533–41. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.116.5.533.

45. Pedersen R.N., Esen B.Ö., Mellemkjær L., Christiansen P., Ejlertsen B., Lash T.L., Nørgaard M., Cronin-Fenton D. The Incidence of Breast Cancer Recurrence 10-32 Years After Primary Diagnosis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022; 114(3): 391–99. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab202.

46. Nolan L., Davey M.G., Calpin G.G., Ryan É.J., Boland M.R. Risk of locoregional recurrence after breast cancer surgery by molecular subtype-a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ir J Med Sci. 2024; 193(6): 2965–74. doi: 10.1007/s11845-024-03809-z.

47. Ge I., Erbes T., Juhasz-Böss I. Prognostic value and management of regional lymph nodes in locoregional breast cancer recurrence: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022; 306(4): 943–57. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06352-9.

48. Bothou Α., Margioula-Siarkou C., Petousis S., Margioula-Siarkou G., Zervoudis S., Sotiriadis A., Amant F., Dinas K. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer during pregnancy: A comprehensive update. Eur J Clin Invest. 2024; 54(3): e14134. doi: 10.1111/eci.14134.


Review

For citations:


Kostrygin A.K., Blinova K.A., Alekseev V.V., Frolova D.E., Suvorov V.A., Zolkina M.A., Gutova D.V., Ionov K.A., Antropova V.V., Mishina I.E. Current concepts of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: a literature review. Siberian journal of oncology. 2025;24(4):112-121. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2025-24-4-112-121

Views: 26


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1814-4861 (Print)
ISSN 2312-3168 (Online)